I have recently encountered a series of perturbation problems in which the Big Oh notation is used frequently. Since I have not encountered this notation before, I am a little bit confused about it. I have read various websites about it, and I get the idea behind it (I also can quite easily look at a function and determine what order the function has), but a few statements in my text book still leave me confused.
For instance, in my book it says the following at one point:
Consider
$q(x,\epsilon) = y_{0} + y_{1} = e^{1-x} + e(1 - e^{-x/ \epsilon})$
If $x = O(1)$, then
$q(x, \epsilon) = e^{1-x} + e + O(\epsilon)$
I am a little bit confused about the whole "If $x = O(1)$, then. . ." part of the problem. Why is it here necessary to state this? Is this because, if $x = O(1)$, then we have $x < A$, where $A$ is a constant? Thus $x$ does not approach infinity, and then the last estimation above follows? Is this correct reasoning? This is what I assume based on how I've interprerted the definition of Big Oh, but I could be wrong here.
I would greatly appreciate it if someone could explain this to me.