Commutative $AW^*$-algebra are characterized as those $C^*$-algebras such that their space of projections is a complete boolean algebra (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AW*-algebra).

Von Neumann algebras are characterized as those $C^*$-subalgebras $A$ of $B(H)$ satisfying any of these three equivalent conditions - see section 4.6 in Pedersen's book "Analysis Now" (specifically Theorem 4.6.7 and Proposition 4.6.15):

  • $A$ overlaps with its double commutant $A''$ (where $A'=\{T:ST=TS \, for \, all \, S\in A\}$).

  • $A$ is weakly closed ($A$ is closed in the topology generated by the seminorms $T\mapsto |(Tx,y)|$ for $x,y\in H$).

  • $A$ is $\sigma$-weakly closed ($A$ is closed in the topology generated by by the seminorms $T\mapsto |\sum_n(Tx_n,y_n)|$ for $x_n,y_n\in H$ such that $\sum \|x_n \|,\sum\|y_n\|<\infty$).

Let now for example $A$ be the commutative $AW^*$-algebra given by $[f]_I$ with $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{C}$ Borel and bounded and $I$ the ideal generated by functions with meager support. It is shown in Tristan Bice's answer to Examples of hyperstonean space that this $AW^*$-algebra does not carry normal positive functionals and thus it is not a Von Neumann algebra. However $A$ is a $C^*$-algebra so (By the GNS-construction) it has an isomorphic copy as a $C^*$-subalgebra of $B(H)$ (It may be the case that $H$ is a non-separable Hilbert space though, but I don't think this matters in what follows). Where does the double commutant Theorem (4.6.7) fails for this $AW^*$-subalgebra of $B(H)$? I'm a bit puzzled - I can expect that there is a problem with $\sigma$-weakly continuous functionals, but I don't see where the problem can arise with weakly continuous functionals.


The first statement is not quite right - $C([0,1])$ is a commutative C*-algebra but not an AW*-algebra, even though its only projections are the constant 0 and 1 functions, which certainly constitutes a complete Boolean algebra. However, it is true that AW*-algebras are precisely the real rank zero C*-algebras whose projections form a complete lattice. In the commutative case this corresponds to the fact that a topological space is extremally disconnected iff it is totally disconnected and its clopen sets form a complete lattice. I should have mentioned this myself in the previous post you refer to.

To represent an abstract C*-algebra $A$ concretely on a Hilbert space $H$, we usually consider the universal representation $\pi=\bigoplus\pi_\phi$ where $\phi$ ranges over all states on $A$ and $\pi_\phi$ comes from the GNS construction, as you mention. I'm not sure if this answers your question, but you can show that $\pi[A]$ is not a von Neumann subalgebra of $B(H)$, i.e. $\pi[A]\neq\pi[A]''$, not just for the AW*-algebra you had in mind, but in fact for any infinite dimensional C*-algebra $A$. This is because you can identify $\pi[A]\subseteq\pi[A]''$ with $A\subseteq A^{**}$ and C*-algebras are reflexive if and only if they are finite dimensional (see Finite dimensional $C^*$-algebras). So, strange as it may seem, even a von Neumann algebra $A$ can be represented faithfully as a non-weakly closed subalgebra of $\mathcal{B}(H)$, as long as $A$ is infinite dimensional.

Alternatively, you could consider the atomic representation, where $\phi$ above ranges only over pure states, which is still faithful on $A$. But here too we can show that $\pi[A]\neq\pi[A]''$ whenever $A$ is infinite dimensional, by even constructing a projection $p\in\pi[A]''\setminus\pi[A]$ (which is perhaps more what you are looking for?). To see this, first note that it suffices to consider unital $A$ - otherwise $1\in\pi[A]''\setminus\pi[A]$. Now take a maximal commutative C*-subalgebra $B$ of $A$, which necessarily contains the unit and is also infinite dimensional. Identify $B$ with $C(X)$, where $X$ is the space of all pure states on $B$ with the weak*-topology. As $B$ is unital, $X$ is compact, and as $B$ is infinite dimensional, $X$ is infinite. But infinite discrete spaces are not compact so $X$ must contain a non-isolated point $\phi$, which can be extended to a pure state on all of $A$. Thus we have $v\in H$ with $\phi(a)=\langle\pi(a)v,v\rangle$, for all $a\in A$ (and $T\mapsto\langle Tv,v\rangle$ is certainly a weakly continuous functional on $\mathcal{B}(H)$). As $\{\pi(b):b\in B^1_+\text{ and }\phi(b)=0\}$ is directed, it has a supremum $p\in\pi[B]''$ with $\langle pv,v\rangle=0$. But $B$ is commutative so $\pi[B]\subseteq\pi[B]'$ and hence $\pi[B]''\subseteq\pi[B]'$. Thus if we had $q\in A$ with $\pi(q)=p$ then we would have $q\in B'$ and hence $q\in B$ by maximality. As $b\leq q$, for all $b\in B^1_+$ with $\phi(b)=0$, we must have $q=1$, as $\phi$ is not isolated. But $1=\phi(1)=\langle\pi(1)v,v\rangle=\langle\pi(q)v,v\rangle=\langle pv,v\rangle=0$, a contradiction. Thus $p\notin\pi[A]$.

To ensure that $\pi[A]=\pi[A]''$, we must restrict to a different class of states on $A$, namely the normal states. And if there are not enough of these (e.g. none in Dixmier's example) then $\pi$ will no longer be faithful.

  • $\begingroup$ Thanks, very informative answer. Is there a simple definition of normal state or where do I find one? I've also come up with the following idea which I haven't written up since I do not know how much correct it was, however you might immediately say if it's a good direction. If $A=C(X)$ with $X$ extremely disconnected we can consider $D\subset X$ has a base for an Hilbert space $H_D$ and then assign a state (or projection $p_U:H_D\to H_D$ to any clopen set $U$ of $X$ by letting $p_U(x)=1$ off $x\in D\cap U$ and then extend by linearity. $\endgroup$ Apr 9 '15 at 16:14
  • $\begingroup$ Now the family $p_U$ describes the projections in the representation of $A$ and the double commutant of $A$ will instead include all possible projections of $H_D$ whose range is contained in spaces generated by unit vectors in an arbitrary subset of D. In this way the double commutant of $A$ is given by all projections whose range is a subspace of H_D generated by unit vectors in D which corresponds if I understand correctly thing to a hyperstonean space given by the ``atomic'' measures on $D$ (even if it is not totally clear to me what is an atomic measure on $D$ if $D$ is uncountable). $\endgroup$ Apr 9 '15 at 16:17
  • $\begingroup$ Your example (by Dixmier) of an $A=C(X)$ in your answer cited in my question gives an extremely disconnected $X$ which has a countable subset $D$. So in this case the double commutant of $A$ would really be $l^\infty(D)$ with the counting measure on $D$. Is this correct? $\endgroup$ Apr 9 '15 at 16:26
  • $\begingroup$ A state $\phi$ on a monotone complete C*-algebra $A$ is normal iff it preserves bounded directed supremums $\bigvee$, i.e. iff $\phi(\bigvee X)=\bigvee\phi(X)$ for any bounded directed subset $X$ of $A_\mathrm{sa}$ (see Pedersen's "C*-algebras and their Automorphism Groups" 3.9.2). And yes, I think you're on the right track with your other thoughts but again you don't need to restrict to commutative AW*-algebras/extremally disconnected spaces. $\endgroup$ Apr 13 '15 at 19:47
  • $\begingroup$ Specifically, for any subset $D$ of a compact Hausdorff space $X$, we have a representation $\pi$ of the C*-algebra $C(X)$ on the Hilbert space $l^2(D)$ given by $\pi(f)e_d=f(d)e_d$ (where $e_d$ is the canonical basis vector corresponding to $d\in D$, i.e. $e_d(d)=1$ while $e_d(x)=0$ otherwise). Then $\pi[A]''$ can be identified with $l^\infty(D)$, so it's projections are characteristic functions of arbitrary subsets of $D$, while the projections of $\pi[A]$ are precisely the characteristic functions of clopen subsets of $D$. $\endgroup$ Apr 13 '15 at 19:50

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.