1
$\begingroup$

Here is Theorem 4.20 in the book Principles of Mathematical Analysis by Walter Rudin, third edition:

Let $E$ be a non-compact set in $\mathbb{R}^1$. Then

(a) there exists a continuous function on $E$ which is not bounded;

(b) there exists a continuous and bounded function on $E$ which has no maximum.

If, in addition, $E$ is bounded, then

(c) there exists a continuous function on $E$ which is not uniformly continuous.

Thus Theorem 4.20(c) can be stated as follows: On a bound subset non-compact of $\mathbb{R}$, there exists a continuous function which is not uniformly continuous. Or, equivalently, if every continuous function on a non-compact subset $E$ of $\mathbb{R}$ is also uniformly continuous, then $E$ is unbounded.

Now my question is as follows:

Let $E$ be a non-compact subset of $\mathbb{R}$ such that $E$ is not bounded. Then can we conclude from Theorem 4.20(c) in Baby Rudin that every continuous function $f \colon E \to \mathbb{R}$ is also uniformly continuous on $E$? If so, then how to give a proof of this fact?

And, is there a way of generalising this result to maps between arbitrary metric spaces, along the lines of Theorem 4.19 in Baby Rudin?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Whatever Theorem 4.20(c) is, the answer is "no". $\endgroup$ – David Mitra Feb 24 '15 at 12:56
4
$\begingroup$

This is not true. Take $E=\mathbb R$ for example. Then your "theorem" would imply that every continuous function $\mathbb R\to\mathbb R$ is also uniformly continuous, which is wrong. Consider $f(x)=x^2$ as a counterexample.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ how do we show that the map $x \mapsto x^2$ for $x \in \mathbb{R}$ is not uniformly continuous? $\endgroup$ – Saaqib Mahmood Feb 24 '15 at 13:21
  • $\begingroup$ @SaaqibMahmuud By contradiction, from the definition of uniform continuity. $\endgroup$ – chi Feb 24 '15 at 13:43
  • $\begingroup$ @SaaqibMahmuud: See this thread for how to show $x^2$ is not uniformly continuous on $\mathbb{R}$: math.stackexchange.com/questions/503093/… $\endgroup$ – Sujaan Kunalan Feb 24 '15 at 14:08
0
$\begingroup$

assertion c need not to be always true for unbounded non compact set. AS we have counter example of set of integers. f(x)=x^2 is uniformly continous on set of integers. In fact assertion c is not always wrong for unbounded non compact set but we have a counter example.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.