1
$\begingroup$

Apologies if I've used terms incorrectly. What I mean:

  1. Far as I know, the limit of $x-5$ exists for all real numbers.

  2. $\displaystyle\frac{(x-5)(x+5)}{x+5} = x-5$

  3. But the limit of the left-hand side of $(2)$ doesn't exist (or isn't defined?) at $x = -5$, whereas the limit of the right-hand side $x-5$ does exist at $x = -5$.

So, if the left and right-hand parts of $(2)$ are equivalent, but only one has a limit at $x = -5$, does that make them, I don't know, equivalent but not interchangeable? Or is it not even a useful question to ask?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ the limit of 2 does exist for both left and right hand side. $\endgroup$ – Arashium Feb 21 '15 at 19:54
  • $\begingroup$ Limit means that the function approaches the value,$-5$ in this case but it doesn't take the value $-5$.It wouldn't make sense if it took the value $-5$ since the expression is not defined there. $\endgroup$ – kingW3 Feb 21 '15 at 19:59
1
$\begingroup$

Your language is a bit imprecise. It would be much better if you just used limit notation. Also, note that when you evaluate a limit, you're not at all interested in the behavior of the function at the point, but in a neighborhood of it. This is paramount, as you can evaluate limits towards point which aren't in the function's domain.

To summarize:

  1. $\lim\limits_{x \to \alpha} x - 5 \in \mathbb R\,~\forall \alpha \in \mathbb R$
  2. Note that $$\frac{(x-5)(x+5)}{x+5} = x-5\quad\forall x \in \mathbb R \backslash\{5\}$$ so it wouldn't even make sense to consider the point $x = -5$ for the left-hand side, because it isn't even defined there. You can, however, write $$\begin{align}&\lim_{x \to -5} \frac{(x-5)(x+5)}{x+5} = -10\\ &\lim_{x \to -5} x - 5 = -10 \end{align}$$

Why we aren't interested in the exact point $x = -5$? If you recall the definition of a limit, $$\lim_{x \to \alpha}f(x) = l \iff \forall\varepsilon > 0,\,\exists \delta\mbox{ s.t. }0 < |x - \alpha| < \delta \implies |f(x) - l| < \epsilon,$$ you'll notice the part $0 < |x - \alpha| < \delta$. That expression is equivalent to $x \in (-\delta,~\alpha)\cup(\alpha,~\delta)$: the $x$ never takes the value $\alpha$. This way we can define limit for discontinuous functions and extend the definition at infinity, for example.

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

Notice:

In definition of limit:

$$ \lim_{x \to a} f(x) = L \iff (\forall \varepsilon > 0)(\exists \ \delta > 0) (\forall x \in D)(0 < |x - a | < \delta \ \Rightarrow \ |f(x) - L| < \varepsilon) $$

$0 < |x - a |$ means that $x\neq a$ so in $lim_{x\to -5} f(x)$, $x$ is never equal to $(-5)$. $x$ can be very close to $(-5)$ as much as you want but not exactly equal to $(-5)$

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.