2
$\begingroup$

In a comment to the question Finitely many group extensions? Derek Holt mentioned that for the Lamplighter Group $L = C_2\wr\mathbb{Z}$ and the cyclic group $C_2$ with two elements there should be many isomorphism classes of $G$ satisfying the exact sequence

$1\to C_2\to G \to L \to 1$.

What do these groups G look like?
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I don't have a clue, but that wreath symbol is driving me nuts! Why not \wr \mathbb{Z}? $\endgroup$ – pjs36 Feb 19 '15 at 19:07
  • $\begingroup$ @pjs36: Sorry for driving you nuts. Earlier I didn't have time to look up "\wr" and just copied and pasted from the other question. $\endgroup$ – j.p. Feb 19 '15 at 21:08
  • $\begingroup$ No offense intended, I just found it funny, that's all! Why mixing high-level math with ASCII is amusing, I'm not sure... $\endgroup$ – pjs36 Feb 19 '15 at 21:24
3
$\begingroup$

Let $n>0$, let $N_n$ be the group defined by the presentation $\langle X \mid R \rangle$, where $X = \{ x_i :i \in {\mathbb Z}\} \cup \{t\}$, and $$R = \{t^2\} \cup \{x_i^2:i \in {\mathbb Z} \} \cup\{[x_i,t]:i \in {\mathbb Z} \} \cup \{ [x_i,x_{i+n}]t^:i \in {\mathbb Z}\} \cup \{[x_i,x_{i+k}]: i,k \in {\mathbb Z}, k>0,k \ne n \}.$$ So $N_n$ is a central extension by $C_2=\langle t \rangle$ by the infinite elementary abelian $2$-group spanned by the $x_i$. The map $x_i \mapsto x_{i+1}$, $t \mapsto t$ prerves $R$ so it induces an automorphism $\alpha$ of $N_n$, and the semidirect product $G_n = N_n \rtimes_{\alpha} {\mathbb Z}$ is a central extension of $C_2 = \langle t \rangle$ by the Lamplighter Group L=$C_2 \wr {\mathbb Z}$.

We claim that $G_n \not\cong G_m$ for $n \ne m$. Since any such isomorphism would have to mat $N_n$ to $N_m$, it would be induced by an automorphism $\beta$ of $L$. But any such $\beta$ either induces the identity on the quotient ${\mathbb Z}$ of $L$ and translates the $x_i$ by $\beta(x_i) = x_{i+m}$ for some $m$, or it inverts the quotient ${\mathbb Z}$ and relects the $x_i$ by $\beta(x_i) = x_{m-i}$ for some $m$, and in either case, $\beta$ induces an automorphism of each $G_n$. (If $\beta(x_0)$ is a sum of of more than one $x_i$ then it is not hard to see that $x_0 \not\in {\rm im}(\beta)$, so $\beta$ cannot be an automorphism.)

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Very nice, thank you. I'm still struggling to understand if the extra-special $2$-groups $N_n$ are isomorphic or not (if you happen to know, a simple yes/no would be appreciated a lot), but the $G_n$ are different. $\endgroup$ – j.p. Feb 20 '15 at 7:23

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.