13
$\begingroup$

Let $R$ be a ring with identity such that there is a positive integer $n\geq 2$ for which $r^n=r$ for all $r\in R$. Prove $R$ is commutative.

I had proven before that If $n=2$ it is commutative as follows:

$r+s=(r+s)^2=r^2+rs+sr+r^2=r+rs+sr+s\implies 0=rs+sr\implies sr=-rs$

On the other hand $-r=(-1)r=(-1)^2r=r$.

So $sr=-rs=rs$ as desired.

I seem to be stumped even with $n=3$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Playing around with $n = 3$ and assuming that $r$ and $s$ commute, I seem to be getting that $r = -s$. I'm not sure if you get something similar for all $n$, but it seems like forcing $r^n = n$ for all $r \in R$ causes you to have very unusual rings where each element is the negative of every other element. There should probably be some caveat that we must have $s \neq 0 \neq r$, but I wasn't paying much attention to that. $\endgroup$ – pjs36 Feb 18 '15 at 2:23
  • 6
    $\begingroup$ This question has been asked here in various forms, though in full generality I think this is a bit difficult for a homework problem. Perhaps you'll find this link helpful: math.ucla.edu/~ggim/W14-110BH.pdf $\endgroup$ – Alex Wertheim Feb 18 '15 at 3:02
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ See the answer in math.stackexchange.com/questions/360958/… . I have no the book of Herestein. However, in this special case might exist a simple proof. Please, ask your professor to show the solution of this homework, and share the ideas with us. $\endgroup$ – vesszabo Feb 25 '15 at 17:56
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Duplicate of: math.stackexchange.com/q/831124/15416, which also doesn't have an answer, but more links. $\endgroup$ – Julian Kuelshammer Mar 8 '15 at 9:53
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Here is one more link, namely Herstein has a paper entitled "An elementary proof of a theorem of Jacobson", where he proves it on 4 pages: projecteuclid.org/download/pdf_1/euclid.dmj/1077465581 $\endgroup$ – Christian Lomp Jun 13 '18 at 9:41
2
$\begingroup$

The proof is found in the literature but is perhaps too long for an answer here on math.SE. We have long suffered from a lack of a canonical answer for this question, so this is an attempt at an approximation to one.


Even more is true:

If for each $x$ there exists an integer $n(x)>1$ such that $x^{n(x)}-x$ is in the center of $R$, then $R$ is commutative.

There are a few proofs in the literature, ones which are probably too long for a post here.

You should consult your local library to obtain a copy of one of these (probably preferring the newest one you can get):

N. Jacobson, "Structure theory for algebraic algebras of bounded degree", Ann. of Math. 46 (1945), 695–707.

Herstein, I. N. "An elementary proof of a theorem of Jacobson", Duke Mathematical Journal 21.1 (1954): 45-48.

Rogers, Kenneth. "An elementary proof of a theorem of Jacobson", Abhandlungen aus dem Mathematischen Seminar der Universität Hamburg. Vol. 35. No. 3. Springer Berlin/Heidelberg, 1971.

A proof of an even more general nature is also discussed as Theorem 3.2.3 in:

Herstein, Israel Nathan. Noncommutative rings. Vol. 15. American Mathematical Soc., 1994.

There are also useful related questions on this site:

  1. $x^n = x$ implies commutativity, a universal algebraic proof?
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.