7
$\begingroup$

If $X$ is a Poisson distribution with mean $\lambda$ how is $X^2$ distributed? Any explanation would be very appreciated.

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ You should be able to work this out yourself (Hint: $P\{X^2 = k\} = 0$ unless $k$ is the square of a non-negative integer). As far as I know, there is no specific name for this distribution: call it Squared-Poisson if you like. $\endgroup$ – Dilip Sarwate Mar 1 '12 at 16:44
7
$\begingroup$

Your title would be better phrased as "If $X$ is a Poisson-distributed random variable with mean $\lambda$, how is $X^2$ distributed?" or "If $X$ has a Poisson distribution with mean $\lambda$, how is $X^2$ distributed?".

I don't think much can be said beyond the fact that $\Pr(X^2 = x^2) = \dfrac{\lambda^x e^{-\lambda}}{x!}$.

One thing of possible interest is that $\operatorname{E}(X^2) = \lambda+\lambda^2.\,$ This is an instance of a pattern: $$ \begin{align} \operatorname{E}(X^3) & = \lambda + 3\lambda^2 + \lambda^3 \\ \operatorname{E}(X^4) & = \lambda + 7\lambda^2 + 6 \lambda^3 + \lambda^4 \\ \operatorname{E}(X^5) & = \lambda + 15\lambda^2 + 25 \lambda^3 + 10\lambda^4 + \lambda^5 \\ & \,\,\, \vdots \end{align} $$ The coefficient of $\lambda^k$ in the expansion of $\operatorname{E}(X^n)$ is the number of (un-ordered) partitions of a set of size $n$ into $k$ parts. I.e., it's $\left\{\begin{array}{c} n \\ k \end{array}\right\} = $ a Stirling number of the second kind. These are called the "exponential polynomials" or "Touchard polynomials".

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you very much! Could to elaborate how you found the expectation of $X^2$? $\endgroup$ – Freeman Mar 1 '12 at 17:50
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ @LHS: I think the easiest way to find $E(X^2)$ is to first find $E(X(X-1))$. $\endgroup$ – André Nicolas Mar 1 '12 at 17:59
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @LHS : I think the comment by André Nicolas is what you need. It's easier to find the "factorial moments" $\mathbb{E}(X(X-1)(X-2)\cdots(X-n+1))$ than the moments $\mathbb{E}(X^n)$. But if you know the first $n$ factorial moments, you can use them to find the first $n$ moments. That doesn't prove that the assertion about partitions above will continue to hold for all $n$. For that, you might start with the article on Stirling numbers. $\endgroup$ – Michael Hardy Mar 1 '12 at 19:07
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you both very much! this is very helpful $\endgroup$ – Freeman Mar 1 '12 at 23:46

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.