6
$\begingroup$

Suppose that $V$ is a finite dimension inner product space and $W$ is a subspace of $V$. Then we know that $V = W \oplus W^{\perp}$.

What is this $\oplus$ operator? Is it equivalent to union $\bigcup$ or intersection $\bigcap$?

$\endgroup$
0

1 Answer 1

7
$\begingroup$

Let $V$ a vector space and let $U_1,\,U_2$ subspaces of $V$.

You may already know that $W=U_1+ U_2=\{ u_1+u_2\,\,:\,\,u_1\in U_1,\,u_2\in U_2\}$ is a subspace of $V$. But if $U_1\cap U_2=\{ 0\}$ where $0$ is the identity element in the abelian group $(V,+)$, then $W$ is called the direct sumof $U_1$ and $U_2$ and we write: $W=U_1 \oplus U_2$. An equivalent definition is that $W=U_1\oplus U_2$ if and only if $\forall w\in W,\exists !(u_1,u_2)\in U_1\times U_2,\,w=u_1+u_2$.

To compare $\oplus$ with operations in sets, let's say that $U_1\oplus U_2$ is equivalent to $A\cup B$ when $A\cap B=\emptyset$. $U_1$ and $U_2$ are subspaces of $V$ so they must have $0$, thus we take instead $U_1\cap U_2=\{0\}$.

We can prove that if $V$ is a finite-dimensional vector space and $U_1$ and $U_2$ are subspaces of $V$ (thus they're both finite-dimensional) then $V=U_1\oplus U_2$ if and only if $U_1\cap U_2=\{0\}$ and $\dim V=\dim U_1+\dim U_2$.

More generally, suppose $U_1,...,U_n$ are finite-dimensional subspaces of a vector space $V$ such as $U_1+...+U_n$ is a direct sum. Then $U_1\oplus ...\oplus U_n$ is finite-dimensionale and we have $\dim (U_1\oplus ...\oplus U_n)=\dim U_1+...+\dim U_n$.

So when you say $V=W\oplus W^\perp$ it means that $\forall v\in V,\exists !(x,y)\in W\times W^\perp,\,v=x+y$.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ So is the direct sum decomposition means $U_1\oplus\dots\oplus U_n$ or $V=W\oplus W^\perp$ which orthogonality is required? $\endgroup$ Nov 4, 2018 at 8:39
  • $\begingroup$ @Isana Yashiro Honestly I never came accross the expression "direct sum decomposition", so I can't really answer. My guess is that, you know, just as, when we say that we can "decompose" an integer as a sum of four squares, we mean any integer $n$ can be "written" as the sum of four perfect squares, same goes for direct sum: if $V=U\oplus W$, this may probably (I'm not sure) be said as: $V$ can be decomposed as the direct sum of $U$ and $W$. $\endgroup$ Nov 4, 2018 at 15:13

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .