1
$\begingroup$

I have a particular operator, namely $A=-i\frac{d}{dx}$ that I would like to Cayley transform. $A$ is defined on the Hilbert space $L^{2}[0,1]$ and has domain $\mathcal{D}_{\alpha}=\{g:g \in C^{\infty}, \, g(1)=e^{i \alpha}g(0)\}$.

I can find the eigenfunctions and eigenvalues for $A$:

Eigenfunctions: $\, f^{\alpha}_{n}(x)=e^{i(2 \pi n + \alpha)x}, \, n \in \mathbb{Z},$

Eigenvalues: $\, 2 \pi n + \alpha, \, n \in \mathbb{Z}.$

As previously stated, my interest is in the Cayley transform of $A$, namely

$$U(A)=(A-i)(A+i)^{-1}.$$

The problem that I am having is computation of the inverse $(A+i)^{-1}$. I have only been able to write down the trivial steps

$$(A+i)^{-1}=(-i\frac{d}{dx}+i)^{-1}=(-i(\frac{d}{dx}-1))^{-1},$$

and am stuck at this point. To elucidate my motivation for the calculation I am searching for the eigenvalues of the Cayley transform $U(A).$

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

There are two reasonable methods that I can see.

Method 1: If you want $g=(A-\lambda I)^{-1}f$, then $g$ is the unique solution of the ODE $$ -ig'(x)-\lambda g(x) = f(x),\\ g(1)=e^{i\alpha}g(0). $$ You can solve this equation for all $f$ iff $\lambda\notin\sigma(A)$. The solution is obtained by multiplying by the integrating factor $e^{-i\lambda x}$, integrating both from $0$ to $t$, and solving for the unknown $g(0)$ by imposing the second condition. The method is basic Calculus, but a little messy. However, this method is far more fundamental and basic than the next method.

Method 2: You can see that $e_{n}(x)=e^{(2\pi n+\alpha) ix}$ are eigenfunctions of $A$ with eigenvalues $\lambda_{n}=(2\pi n+\alpha)$ because $e_{n}(1)=e^{i\alpha}e_{n}(0)$. And $\{ e^{(2\pi n+\alpha)ix}\}_{n=-\infty}^{\infty}$ is a complete orthonormal basis of $L^{2}(0,1)$ because the ordinary exponentials are an orthonormal basis. Therefore, $$ (A-\lambda I)^{-1}f = \sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty}\frac{1}{2\pi n + \alpha-\lambda}\left(\int_{0}^{1}f(t)e^{-(2\pi n+\alpha)it}dt\right)e^{(2\pi n+\alpha)ix}. $$ This method relies on knowing the completeness of the exponentials and the selfadjointness of $A$, and realizing that $(U_{\alpha}f)(t)=e^{i\alpha t}f(t)$ is a unitary map on $L^{1}(0,1)$ that maps the complete orthonormal basis $\{ e^{2\pi in x}\}$ onto another complete orthonormal basis $\{ e^{(2\pi n+\alpha)ix} \}$. (This map also trivially relates $A_{\alpha}$ to $A_{0}$.)

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

If $$(-i\frac{\partial}{\partial x}+i)=g$$ then

$$(1-\frac{\partial}{\partial x})f=-ig$$

$$f=\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}-i\frac{\partial^n}{\partial x^n}g$$

Now $h(t)=e^{-it\alpha}g(t)$ satisfies $h(0)=h(1)$. Writing $h$ as a Fourier series gives you $g$ as a sum of exponentials for which the expression for $(A+i)^{-1}$ above is easy to compute.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.