In a ring with unity, does prime imply irreducible? In a unique factorization ring with unity (I am not considering commutativity and zero divisors in definition of UFD) irreducible implies prime. 
And it was proved in ring with unity without zero divisors (commutativity not necessary) prime implies irreducible in question Prime which is not irreducible in non-commutative ring with unity without zero divisors.
So question is: 

Does in a ring with unity prime implies irreducible or not?

Definitions: $p$ is prime iff $p|ab$ implies that $p|a$ or $p|b$, and $x$ is irreducible iff $x = ab$ implies that either $a$ or $b$ is a unit.
 A: In a ring with zero divisors, a prime element need not be irreducible. A simple example is $\mathbb{Z}/(6)$, where we see that the elements $\overline{2},\, \overline{3}$ and $\overline{4}$ are all prime - the primes $\overline{2}$ and $\overline{4}$ are associated, $\overline{4} = \overline{5}\cdot\overline{2}$ - as one verifies, but we have
$$\overline{2} = \overline{2}\cdot \overline{4},\quad \overline{4} = \overline{2}\cdot \overline{2}\quad\text{and}\quad \overline{3} = \overline{3}\cdot \overline{3},$$
so none of them is irreducible.
A: Using the definition of "irreducible" you wrote in the question, the answer is no, as illustrated in Daniel's answer.  However, the generally accepted definition of "irreducible" by those who do research on factorization in commutative rings with zero divisors is:  $a$ is irreducible if $a = bc \Rightarrow (a) = (b)$ or $(a) = (c)$.  Using this definition, the answer is yes.  The definition in the question is what factorization experts would call "very strongly irreducible".  See "Factorization in commutative rings with zero divisors" by Anderson and Valdes-Leon for more information.
