The Game

Two players $P_{1}$ and $P_{2}$ will play the following game:

  1. Three non-negative numbers $a$, $b$, and $c$ will be selected at random from a distribution unknown to either player. The players know only that the numbers will be non-negative.

  2. Player $P_{1}$ will be given a choice of two options, after they make their selection the values of $a$, $b$, and $c$ will be revealed, and $P_1$ and $P_2$ will score points depending on the values of $a$, $b$, and $c$ as described below. ($P_2$ makes no choices.)

  3. Player $P_{1}$'s two options are:

    • Option 1: Score points equal to $a+b$.
    • Option 2: Score points equal to the maximum value of $a$, $b$, or $c$.

    Note: Neither player knows the values of $a$, $b$, or $c$ at the time this choice is made.

  4. Whichever option $P_{1}$ selects, $P_{2}$ will score the points of the other unselected option.
    For example, if:

    • $P_1$ selects Option 2
    • $a$, $b$, and $c$ turn out to be $1$, $17$, and $\pi$ respectively


    • $P_1$ scores $17$ points (e.g. the maximum of $1$, $17$, and $\pi$)
    • $P_2$ scores $18$ points (e.g. $a+b = 1+17 = 18$)
  5. The player who scores the most points wins the game. (Ties are also possible.)

The Scenario

Let's assume:

  • The game will be played some number $N$ times, with the unknown distribution from which $a$, $b$, and $c$ are selected remaining fixed over these $N$ games.
  • $P_1$ must select the same choice of Option 1 or 2 in each of the $N$ games. (e.g. they make only one choice at the beginning of Option 1 or 2, which is then applied in every game.)
  • We tabulate both:
    • The number of times each player wins
    • The cumulative points scored by each player over the $N$ games

The Question

  1. Does there exist:

    • A distribution of numbers from which $a$, $b$, and $c$ are selected
    • A choice by $P_1$, and
    • Sufficiently large $N$

Such that both:

  • $P_1$ is expected to win at least as many games as $P_2$, and
  • $P_1$ is also expected to score no more points than $P_2$

? (Thanks to Marcus M for answering this with a clear example!)

  1. Does the answer change if all values must be positive, as opposed to non-zero?

My sense is that there is no such distribution possible when $a$, $b$, and $c$ are positive - but I'm not sure how to go about proving that?

It's fairly easy to construct distributions such that Option 1 or Option 2 both lead to $P_1$ expecting to win more games and scoring more points, for example:

  • If $a$, $b$, and $c$ are always some permutation of 0, 0, and 1 then as $N$ approaches infinity:
    • Option 2 ties 2 games out of 3 and wins 1 game out of 3
    • Option 2 scores 1 point per game whereas Option 1 expects to score $2/3$ points per game
  • If $a$, $b$, and $c$ are selected over a uniform continuous distribution then as $N$ approaches infinity:
    • Option 1 expects to win 5 games out of 6, and score $4/3$rds as many points as Option 2.

However I'm interested if it's possible to have distribution where there is a split outcome of winning more while also scoring less overall.

Thanks for reading!


I believe that it is indeed possible and the following distribution does it. Consider $a, b$ and $c$ are a permutation of $0, 1$ and $10$, with every permutation chosen with equal probability. If $P_1$ always chooses $a + b$, then the possibilities (with equal probability) are

  • $c = 0,~a + b = 11$: $P_1$ scores $11$, $P_2$ scores $10$.
  • $c = 1,~a + b = 10$: $P_1$ scores $10$, $P_2$ scores $10$.
  • $c = 10,~a + b = 1$: $P_1$ scores $1$, $P_2$ scores $10$.

Then $P_1$ wins the first case, ties the second case, and loses in the third case, meaning that $P_1$ wins exactly as often as $P_2$. However, $P_1$'s expected score - $P_2$'s expected score is $\frac{1}{3}\cdot 1 + \frac{1}{3}\cdot 0 + \frac{1}{3}\cdot (-9) = \frac{-8}{3} < 0$. Thus $P_1$ has the same expected number of wins as $P_2$, but has a lower expected score than $P_2$.

  • $\begingroup$ True enough! I wonder if there is a distribution that holds as well when all the values must be positive. $\endgroup$
    – deadcode
    Feb 14 '15 at 9:23
  • $\begingroup$ All the values here are positive; the $\frac{-8}{3}$ is $P_1$'s expected score minus $P_2$'s expected score. This means that $P_1$ has a lower expected score than $P_2$. $\endgroup$
    – Marcus M
    Feb 14 '15 at 14:12
  • $\begingroup$ I meant if all values of a, b, and c must be greater than zero. $\endgroup$
    – deadcode
    Feb 14 '15 at 19:26

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.