81
$\begingroup$

As a part of self study, I am trying to prove the following statement:

Suppose $X$ and $Y$ are topological spaces and $f: X \rightarrow Y$ is a map. Then $f$ is continuous if and only if $f(\overline{A})\subseteq \overline{f(A)}$, where $\overline{A}$ denotes the closure of an arbitrary set $A$.

Assuming $f$ is continuous, the result is almost immediate. Perhaps I am missing something obvious, but I have not been able to make progress on the other direction. Could anyone give me a hint which might illuminate the problem for me?

$\endgroup$
6
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I am not able to come up with any example of a continuous function s.t. $f(\overline{A}) \subsetneq \overline{f(A)}$. Can anyone give such an examples? $\endgroup$
    – MUH
    Mar 11, 2018 at 11:03
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Assuming $f$ is continuous, how exactly is the result "immediate"? $\endgroup$ May 19, 2018 at 18:56
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ @MUH $\pi: \mathbb{R}^2 \to \mathbb{R}$ defined by $\pi(x,y)=x$ and $A = \{(x,\frac{1}{x}): x \neq 0\}$ is an example. $A=\overline{A}$ hence $f[\overline{A}] = f[A]=\mathbb{R}\setminus\{0\}$ and so $\overline{f[A]}=\Bbb R$. $\endgroup$ Aug 27, 2019 at 4:00
  • 12
    $\begingroup$ @AlJebr If $f$ is continuous, $f^{-1}[\overline{f[A]}]$ is closed and contains $A$, so $\overline{A} \subseteq f^{-1}[\overline{f[A]}$ and so $f[\overline{A}] \subseteq \overline{f[A]}$. $\endgroup$ Aug 27, 2019 at 4:02
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @HennoBrandsma : Why does $f^{-1}[\overline{f[A]}]$ containing $A$ imply that the closure of A is also contained in $f^{-1}[\overline{f[A]}]$ ? $\endgroup$ Sep 25, 2020 at 21:38

8 Answers 8

84
$\begingroup$

Because the property is stated in terms of closures, it's I think slightly easier to use the inverse image of closed is closed equivalence of continuity instead:

If $C$ is closed in $Y$, we need to show that $D = f^{-1}[C]$ is closed in $X$.

Now using our closure property for $D$: $$f[\overline{D}] \subseteq \overline{f[D]} = \overline{f[f^{-1}[C]]} \subseteq \overline{C} = C,$$ as $C$ is closed.

This means that $\overline{D} \subseteq f^{-1}[C] = D$, making $D$ closed, as required.

$\endgroup$
12
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I agree, no need to mess with complements. $\endgroup$ Feb 28, 2012 at 22:06
  • $\begingroup$ $C$ should be closed in $Y$, not $X$. $\endgroup$ Feb 29, 2012 at 10:16
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Freeze_S, it seems to me that you have misread the question. The OP was looking for the direction that Henno has proved here. $\endgroup$
    – Carsten S
    Jan 22, 2014 at 18:09
  • $\begingroup$ why the result is imeadiat if $f$ is continuous? $\endgroup$ May 9, 2016 at 0:18
  • $\begingroup$ @GuerlandoOCs the OP asked for one direction only. $\endgroup$ May 9, 2016 at 4:13
32
$\begingroup$

If $f$ is continuous, then $f^{-1}(Y-\overline{f(A)})$ is open; since $f^{-1}(Y-\overline{f(A)}) = X -f^{-1}(\overline{f(A)})$, then $f^{-1}(\overline{f(A)})$ is closed; since $A\subseteq f^{-1}(f(A))\subseteq f^{-1}(\overline{f(A)})$, we conclude that $\overline{A}\subseteq f^{-1}(\overline{f(A)})$, and therefore $f\left(\overline{A}\right)\subseteq f\left(f^{-1}\left(\overline{f(A)}\right)\right)\subseteq \overline{f(A)}$. This proves one direction. (Since you said you already had this, I posted the full argument).

Conversely, assume that for every $A$, $f\left(\overline{A}\right)\subseteq \overline{f(A)}$. Let $V$ be an open subset of $Y$; we want to show that $f^{-1}(V)$ is open; equivalently, we want to show that $X-f^{-1}(V)$ is closed; that is, we want to show that $X-f^{-1}(V)=\overline{X-f^{-1}(V)}$.

By assumption, $f\left(\overline{X-f^{-1}(V)}\right)\subseteq \overline{f(X-f^{-1}(V))}$. Now, $X-f^{-1}(V) = f^{-1}(Y-V)$, so $f(X-f^{-1}(V)) \subseteq Y-V$, which is closed; so $$f\left(\overline{X-f^{-1}(V)}\right)=f\left(\overline{f^{-1}(Y-V)}\right)\subseteq\overline{f\left(f^{-1}(Y-V)\right)}\subseteq Y-V.$$ Therefore, $$\overline{X-f^{-1}(V)} \subseteq f^{-1}(Y-V).$$ Is this sufficient?

$\endgroup$
2
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ That was more than sufficient, thank you. $\endgroup$ Feb 28, 2012 at 16:51
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Converse part is nice. $\endgroup$ Jan 26, 2017 at 15:15
13
$\begingroup$

Henno’s argument is probably the slickest, but one can also work pointwise, either directly or, if one already has those characterizations of continuity, with nets or filters.

Suppose that $f$ is not continuous. Then there is some point $x_0\in X$ at which $f$ fails to be continuous. If $y_0=f(x_0)$, this means that there is an open nbhd $U$ of $y_0$ such that if $V$ is an open nbhd of $x_0$, there is a point $x_V\in V$ such that $f(x_V)\notin U$. Let $$A=\{x_V:V\text{ is an open nbhd of }x_0\}\;.$$

Clearly $x_0\in\overline{A}$, and $f[A]\subseteq Y\setminus U$. Moreover, $Y\setminus U$ is closed, so $\overline{f[A]}\subseteq Y\setminus U$, and hence

$$y_0\in f[\overline{A}]\subseteq\overline{f[A]}\subseteq Y\setminus U\;,$$

contradicting the choice of $U$.

Those who like nets may notice that $A$ actually is a net, over the directed set $\langle\mathscr{N}(x_0),\supseteq\rangle$, where $\mathscr{N}(x_0)$ is the family of open nbhds of $x_0$, and the argument shows that $f$ doesn’t preserve the limit of this net. (I could of course just as well have used the nbhd filter at $x_0$, instead of using only open nbhds.)

Those who prefer filters may modify this to consider the filter $$\mathscr{F}=\{V\cap f^{-1}[Y\setminus U]:V\in\mathscr{N}(x_0)\}$$ instead.

$\endgroup$
9
$\begingroup$

We show that $f$ is continuous at each $x\in X$. Recall that $f$ is continuous at $x$ if for any open nhood $V$ of $f(x)$, there is an open nhood $U$ of $x$ with $f(U)\subseteq V$.

So, let $x\in X$ and let $V$ be an open nhood of $f(x)$. Set $E=X\setminus f^{-1}(V)$. Noting that $f(E)$ is contained in the closed set $V^C$, we see that $$f(\overline{E})\subseteq \overline{f(E)}\subseteq V^C; $$ whence $x\notin \overline E$ (since $f(x)$ is in $V$).

But then $x$ is in the open set $X\setminus \overline{E}$. Moreover, since $X\setminus \overline{E}\subseteq X\setminus E=f^{-1}(V)$, it follows that $f(X\setminus \overline{E})\subseteq V$, as desired.




An aside:

If $X$ were first countable, we could argue using sequences (where a sequence $(x_n)$ converges to $x$ if for any nhood $U$ of $x$ there is an $N$ so that $x_m\in U$ for all $m\ge N$); for in such a space a function is continuous at $x$ if and only if $(f (x_n))$ converges to $f(x)$ whenever $x_n$ converges to $x$.

Indeed, it is easily verified that given $x_n\rightarrow x$ and any subsequence $(x_{n_k})$ of $(x_n)$, that the image of this subsequence under $f$ when thought of as a sequence has a subsequence that converges to $f(x)$. Thus every subsequence of $(f(x_n))$ has a further subsequence which converges to $f(x)$, which implies that $(f(x_n))$ converges to $x$.

Of course, $X$ need not be first countable...

Though I think the sequential method above is a bit much here, I wonder if the argument can be suitably modified to arbitrary $X$ by using nets?

$\endgroup$
0
4
$\begingroup$

Here's one proof of the converse provided $X$ and $Y$ are metric spaces:

Take a limit point $x$ of $A$. Then because $f(\overline{A}) \subseteq \overline{f(A)}$, we have that $f(x)$ is a limit point of $f(A)$.

Because $x$ is a limit point of $A$, for every $\delta > 0$ there is a point $p \in A$ with $|x - p| < \delta$. And because $f(x)$ is a limit point of $f(A)$, for every $\epsilon > 0$, there is a point $q \in f(A)$ with $|f(x) - f(p)| < \epsilon$.

We thus have that for every point $x \in A$ with $|x - p| < \delta$, in fact $|f(x) - f(p)| < \epsilon$, so $f$ must be continuous.

$\endgroup$
6
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ I guess this is a decent enough answer for the case of the real numbers, but the question was about arbitrary topological spaces $X$ and $Y$. $\endgroup$
    – kahen
    Feb 28, 2012 at 16:45
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ We are not in a world where things like $|x-p|$ could make sense. Any "TOPOLOGICAL SPACE" is in question, but any way a good proof that will be useful. I am upvoting and don't delete this answer because of this as it will help close duplicates. $\endgroup$
    – user21436
    Feb 28, 2012 at 16:46
  • $\begingroup$ Can't you just substitute $d(x, p)$ for $|x - p|$? $\endgroup$ Feb 28, 2012 at 16:50
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ @jamaicaworm: Only in a metric space. Not every topological space is a metric space, or even metrizable. $\endgroup$ Feb 28, 2012 at 16:50
  • 6
    $\begingroup$ @jamaicanworm: The post is labeled [general-topology], not [metric-spaces]. The definition of a topological space includes the notion of "open set", and "closed set" is a set whose complement is open. See the definition in Wikipedia. $\endgroup$ Feb 28, 2012 at 16:59
4
$\begingroup$

The assertion is equivalent to:
$\overline{A}\subseteq f^{-1}(\overline{f(A)})$
So, the assertion follows from:
$\overline{A}\subseteq\overline{f^{-1}(f(A))}\subseteq\overline{f^{-1}(\overline{f(A)})}=f^{-1}(\overline{f(A)})$

  1. Inclusion: $A\subseteq f^{-1}(f(A)) \Rightarrow \overline{A}\subseteq\overline{f^{-1}(f(A))}$
  2. Inclusion: $f(A)\subseteq\overline{f(A)} \Rightarrow f^{-1}(f(A))\subseteq f^{-1}(\overline{f(A)}) \Rightarrow \overline{f^{-1}(f(A))}\subseteq \overline{f^{-1}(\overline{f(A)})}$
  3. Equality: $\overline{f(A)} \text{ closed} \Rightarrow f^{-1}(\overline{f(A)}) \text{ closed} \Rightarrow \overline{f^{-1}(\overline{f(A)})}=f^{-1}(\overline{f(A)})$

The converse assertion is equivalent to:
$\overline{B}=B \Rightarrow \overline{f^{-1}(B)}=f^{-1}(B)$
So, the converse assertion follows from:
$f^{-1}(B)\subseteq\overline{f^{-1}(B)}\subseteq f^{-1}(f(\overline{f^{-1}(B)}))\subseteq f^{-1}(\overline{f(f^{-1}(B))}) \subseteq f^{-1}(\overline{B}) =f^{-1}(B)$
That gives:
$f^{-1}(B)=\overline{f^{-1}(B)}$

  1. Inclusion: $A\subseteq \overline{A} \text{ in general}$
  2. Inclusion: $A\subseteq f^{-1}(f(A)) \text{ in general}$
  3. Inclusion: $f(\overline{A})\subseteq \overline{f(A)} \text{ by assumption}$
  4. Inclusion: $f(f^{-1}(B))\subseteq B \text{ in general} \Rightarrow \overline{f(f^{-1}(B))}\subseteq \overline{B} \Rightarrow f^{-1}(\overline{f(f^{-1}(B))})\subseteq f^{-1}(\overline{B})$
  5. Equality: $\overline{B}=B \Rightarrow f^{-1}(\overline{B})=f^{-1}(B)$
$\endgroup$
3
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I don't see how this is shorter than Henno's answer, which is complete since the OP cleared out the other direction. I don't think it is good practice to claim your answer is somehow better than others, and specifically target another user's answer. $\endgroup$
    – Pedro
    Jan 22, 2014 at 17:51
  • $\begingroup$ I'm sorry for that ...got a little bit upset... I deleted that part so there's no bad discussion about it -sorry for that! Anyway Henno only shows that the preimage of a closed sst is closed what is a rather simple consequence. But the assertion is much more tricky than that. See my comment on Henno's answer. $\endgroup$ Jan 22, 2014 at 17:57
  • $\begingroup$ This answer does not mention neither continuity nor the inclusion in the original statement. Can someone please explain this answer? $\endgroup$
    – evaristegd
    Aug 25, 2019 at 1:24
3
$\begingroup$

A proof using nets:

Suppose $y\in f(\overline{A})\backslash \overline{fA}$. Taking $x\in \overline{A}$ with $y=f(x)$; there is a net $x_i\in A$ converging to $x$. Now $f(x_i)$ is a net in $f(A)$ which does not converge to $f(x)$ [for this would imply $f(x)\in \overline{fA}$]. Thus $f$ is not continuous.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ This is the direction that the OP had already been able to show. $\endgroup$ Feb 29, 2012 at 6:08
  • $\begingroup$ @Brian: Yes, sorry! I realized this the day after... $\endgroup$ Mar 2, 2012 at 13:15
0
$\begingroup$

I have a solution I think is really elegant, we just need three facts $$\bigcap f^{-1}(S)=f^{-1}(\bigcap S)$$ $$A\subset B\Longleftrightarrow f^{-1}(A)\subset f^{-1}(B)$$ $$f(A)\subset B\Longleftrightarrow A\subset f^{-1}(B)$$

We make the equivalence

$$f(\overline{A})\subset\overline{f(A)}\Longleftrightarrow \overline{A}\subset f^{-1}(\overline{f(A)})\Longleftrightarrow$$$$\Longleftrightarrow \bigcap_{\text{closed }F\supset A}F\subset\bigcap_{\text{closed }S\supset f(A)}f^{-1}(S)\subset\bigcap_{\text{closed }S,\,A\subset f^{-1}(S)}f^{-1}(S)$$

Now if we assume that every preimage of a closed set is closed, then $f^{-1}(S)$ is closed whenever $S$ is closed, so the intersection on the right is a superset because the intersection is taken on a smaller collection of sets.

Conversely, if the above is true, take $A=f^{-1}(B)$ with $B$ closed. Then $$\overline{f^{-1}(B)}\subset\bigcap_{\text{closed }S,\,f^{-1}(B)\subset f^{-1}(S)}f^{-1}(S)=\bigcap_{\text{closed }S\supset B}f^{-1}(S)\subset f^{-1}(B)$$

The last insclusion for $B$ being itself a closed set. Since every set is a subset of its closure, $f^{-1}(B)$ is closed.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.