Finding simply connected open sets between compact ones and general open ones in $\mathbb R^2$. In a paper  I am reading (not a published one), the following is considered obvious:
Let $K$ be a compact and connected subset of $\,\mathbb R^2$, with $\mathbb R^2\smallsetminus K$ connected, and $U\subset \mathbb R^2$ open with $K\subset U$. Then there exists a simply connected and open  $V\subset \mathbb R^2$, with $K\subset V\subset U$. More generally, if $K$ is compact, $\mathbb R^2\smallsetminus K$ is connected and $U\subset \mathbb R^2$ open with $K\subset U$, then there exists an open  $V\subset \mathbb R^2$, with $K\subset V\subset U$, such that all the connected components of $V$ are simply connected.
I have not managed to see why this is obvious. So far, I have shown this for simply connected compact sets $K$ with sufficiently smooth boundaries. Any ideas?
 A: This is related to "Can the complement of a simply connected set in $\bar{\mathbb{C}}$ in an open set always be covered by a simply connected union of balls?" In fact, Trevors proof needs to be adapted only slightly.
Since $K$ is compact, we can choose $\epsilon > 0$ and a finite set $\{x_1, \ldots, x_n\} \subseteq K$ such that $K$ is contained in the open set
$$
V_0 := \bigcup_{i=1}^n B_\epsilon(x_i)
$$
and $V_0$ is contained in $U$.
Using connectedness of $K$, it can be shown that $V_0$ is path-connected, but $V_0$ will not always be simply connected. However, we can construct a simply connected open subset $V$ of $V_0$ that contains $K$ in the following way.
Note that $V_0$ is bounded. Therefore its complement $\mathbb R^2 \setminus V_0$ has only one unbounded component $E$. By induction on $n$, it should be easy to prove that $\mathbb R^2 \setminus V_0$ has only finitely many bounded components $I_1, \ldots, I_k$. By assumption, $\mathbb R^2 \setminus K$ is open and connected. Thus it is path-connected. Since $E$ and $I_i$ are subsets of $\mathbb R^2 \setminus K$, it follows that for every $i \in \{1, \ldots, k\}$ there is a path $\gamma_i: [0,1] \to \mathbb R^2 \setminus K$ such that $\gamma(0) \in I_i$ and $\gamma(1) \in E$. Note that
$$
\Gamma := \bigcup_{i=1}^k \gamma_i([0,1])
$$
is compact. I try to illustrate the construction above:

Note that the pictured example does not contain all possible pathologies.
Now, let $V$ be the unique connected component of $V_0 \setminus \Gamma$ that contains $K$. (The example above shows that $V_0 \setminus \Gamma$ does not need to be connected.)
We show that $V$ is open. Let $y$ be a point in $V$. Then $y$ is contained in $V_0 \setminus \Gamma$. Since $V_0$ is open and $\Gamma$ is compact, there is a $\delta > 0$ such that $B_\delta(y) \subseteq V_0 \setminus \Gamma$. Since $B_\delta(y)$ is connected, it follows that $B_\delta(y) \subseteq V$. Therefore $V$ is open.
It is easy to see that the unbounded component $E'$ of $\mathbb R^2 \setminus V$ contains the unbounded component $E$ of $\mathbb R^2 \setminus V_0$. It follows that $\Gamma \subseteq E'$ and $I_i \subseteq E'$ for all $i \in \{1, \ldots, k\}$. Thus $\mathbb R^2 \setminus (V_0 \setminus \Gamma) \subseteq E'$. It follows that every bounded component $I'$ of $\mathbb R^2\setminus V$ is a component of $V_0 \setminus \Gamma$. Thus by connectedness of $V_0$, it touches  $\Gamma$, which implies $I' = E'$ contradicting the boundedness of $I'$. Therefore $\mathbb R^2 \setminus V$ is connected. This suffices to prove the Riemann mapping theorem for $V$. The following link explains how this is done in Ahlfors' Complex Analysis: http://math.ucr.edu/~res/math205B/ahlfors.pdf. So $V$ is biholomorphic to the open unit disk and we conclude that $V$ is simply connected. This ends the proof.
A: I want to go at it with complex analysis. Probably overkill, but potentially quite short. I'll use two facts:


*

*Any open subset $X \subset \overline{\mathbb{C}}$ is simply connected if and only if both $X$ and its complement are connected.

*Let $X \subset \overline{\mathbb{C}}$ be open and simply connected in $\overline{\mathbb{C}}$. If its complement has at least two points, then there is a biholomorphism $g : X \to B(0,1)$ (Riemann mapping theorem).
If $K$ is a point, then the result is obvious (take a small ball centered around $K$). Otherwise, we can see $K$ as a connected compact subset of the Riemann sphere $\overline{\mathbb{C}}$. Then $\overline{\mathbb C} \setminus K$ is a connected open subset of the Riemann sphere. By the first fact, $\overline{\mathbb C} \setminus K$ is simply connected. By the second fact, and since $K$ has at least two points, there is a biholomorphism $g : \overline{\mathbb C} \setminus K \mapsto B(0,1)$.
Since $\overline{\mathbb{C}} \setminus U$ is compact in $\overline{\mathbb C} \setminus K$, its image by $g$ is compact in $B(0,1)$. Hence, there exists $\varepsilon > 0$ such that $g(\overline{\mathbb{C}} \setminus U) \subset \overline{B}(0,1-\varepsilon)$.
Take $V := g^{-1} \bigl( \overline{B}(0,1-\varepsilon)^c\bigr) \cup K$, and delete the infinity if it happens to be in this set. Then $\overline{\mathbb C} \setminus V$ is biholomorphic (with $g$) to the disk $\overline B(0,1-\varepsilon)$, which ensures that is is connected (and stays connected if you have to delete the infinity).
The motivation of this proof is that, with the conformal mapping theorem, I can make the complementary of $K$ look like a disk, which allows me to shrink it a little without having to worry about potential pathologies.
