I always thought linear functions need to satisfy $$f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y).$$ I am a tad confused now, consider $f(x)=2x+3$. $f(1)=5$, $f(2)=7$, $f(1+2)=f(3)=9 \neq f(1)+f(2)$ which was what I thought linear functions should satisfy.

Could someone clarify?


You're confusing between two different notions.

In calculus, a linear function is a polynomial function of the form $f(x)=ax+b$.

In linear algebra and functional analysis, a linear function is a linear map. (one of the properties that it satisfies is $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$, known as additivity)

The difference between the two is that the latter needs to have $f(0)=0$. Proof: $$f(0)=f(0+0)=f(0)+f(0)=2f(0)\iff f(0)=0.$$ I discuss this in more detail in my (not yet finished) note.

  • 7
    $\begingroup$ actually, $f(x) = a x + b$ is called affine in the general, and linear iff $b=0$ $\endgroup$ – TemplateRex Feb 7 '15 at 21:19
  • 8
    $\begingroup$ @TemplateRex In most standard calculus textbook, a linear function is defined as a function whose graph is a line. That's why I emphasized the distinction between a linear function in the context of calculus, and in the context of linear algebra and functional analysis. Although I do agree that calling it affine would have been much better. $\endgroup$ – Workaholic Feb 7 '15 at 21:26
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Not only in calculus. If you look up the definition of a splitting field, it will probably talk about a polynomial splitting "into linear factors". The linear factors are not necessarily of the form $ax$. $\endgroup$ – bof Feb 9 '15 at 8:20

$f(x)$ = $2x$ + $3$ isn't a linear function (from and to the set of real numbers). You can easily see that $f(x+y)$ = $2x$ + $2y$ + $3$, and that $f(x)$ + $f(y)$ = $2x$ + $2y$ + $6$. Equality obviously fails.

A linear function (as a mapping from and to the set of real numbers) should be in the from $ax$, where $a$ is a constant real number.

  • 7
    $\begingroup$ You will find a large number of textbooks and websites which would describe $f(x)=2x+3$ as a "linear function". Others may not, but that merely means that the term is ambiguous. $\endgroup$ – Henry Feb 8 '15 at 11:36

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.