1
$\begingroup$

Please check my work. Did I calculate the following inverse Laplace Transform correctly? Our Laplace Transform is...

$$\mathcal{L}\{f(t)\}=\frac{e^{-\pi s}}{s^2+2s+2}$$

My solution:

Recognizing the exponential factor as a t-shift we pull it to the side. We can also rewrite the denominator as the sum of two squares...

$$\mathcal{L}\{f(t)\}=e^{-\pi s}\cdot \frac{1}{(s+1)^2+1}$$

This reveals that we also have an s-shift. The rest is just pattern matching...

$$\mathcal{L^{-1}}\{f(t)\}=e^{-t}\cdot sin(t-\pi)\cdot u(t-\pi)$$

Therefore...

$$f(t)=-e^{-t}\cdot sin(t)\cdot u(t-\pi)$$

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

I obtained a slightly different answer then yours. In this post of yours, I defined the Inverse Laplace transform. The poles of this function occur at $s=-1\pm i$. Using the same definition, we have \begin{align} \mathcal{L}^{-1}\{F(s)\} &= \int_{\gamma-i\infty}^{\gamma+i\infty}\frac{e^{s(t-\pi)}}{s^2+2s+2}ds\\ &=\lim_{s\to -1+i}(s+1-i)\frac{e^{s(t-\pi)}}{s^2+2s+2}+\lim_{s\to -1-i}(s+1+i)\frac{e^{s(t-\pi)}}{s^2+2s+2} \end{align} Again, we have to contend with convergence of the exponential. As in the linked post, we take $s(t-\pi)<0$ so we need $\mathcal{U}(t-\pi)$. \begin{gather} \mathcal{L}^{-1}\{F(s)\} = \frac{e^{-(t-\pi)}e^{i(t-\pi)}}{2i}\mathcal{U}(t-\pi)+\frac{e^{-(t-\pi)}e^{-i(t-\pi)}}{-2i}\mathcal{U}(t-\pi)\\ =e^{-(t-\pi)}\mathcal{U}(t-\pi)\sin(t-\pi) \end{gather}

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.