A series $\sum_{k=0}^{∞}a_k$ is said to be Cesaro summable to an $L\in R$ if and only if $\sigma_n = \sum_{k=0}^{n-1}(1 - \frac{k}{n})a_k$ converges to $L$ as $n$ → $∞$.

Let $s_n = \sum_{k=0}^{n-1}a_k$ be the partial sums of $\sum_{k=0}^{∞}a_k$. And let $\sigma_{n} = \frac{s_1 + \cdots+ s_n}{n}$ for every natural $n$.

Exercise: Prove that if ${a_k}$ is real sequence and $\sum_{k=0}^{∞}a_k = L$ converges, then $\sum_{k=0}^{∞}a_k$ is Cesaro summable to $L$.

Attempt in proof: Suppose ${a_k}$ is real sequence and $\sum_{k=0}^{∞}a_k = L$ converges. Then by definition, $\sum_{k=0}^{∞}a_k = L$ converges if and only if its sequence of partial sums ${s_n}$ converges to $L\in R$. That is, for every $\epsilon > 0$there is an $N \in N$ such that $n \geq N$ implies $|s_n - L| < \epsilon$.

Or we could show if $|\sigma_{n} - L| < \epsilon $ then $\sum_{k=0}^{∞}a_k$ is Cesaro summable. Then $|\sigma_{n} - L| = | \frac{s_1 + \cdots+ s_n}{n} - L| = |\sum_{k=0}^{n-1}(1 - \frac{k}{n})a_k - L|$

Can someone please help me ? I don't know how to simplify, to see if the expression will converge. I would really appreciate it.

Thank you.


So it will save some notation to just rephrase this problem in terms of sequences (as you started doing). We say $(a_n)$ cesaro-converges to $\ell$ if the sequence of its running averages $\sigma_n$ converges to $\ell$. We are trying to prove cesaro-convergence is implied by ordinary convergence.

Let $\epsilon >0$. Let $N$ be such that all terms $a_k$ with $k > N$ satisfy $$ |a_k-\ell| < \epsilon/3. $$

Now you can look at $\sigma_M$ for $M$ large enough as $$ \sigma_M = \frac{a_1+\cdots+a_N}{M} + \frac{a_{N+1} + \cdots + a_M}{M}. $$

The second summand can be viewed as: $$ \frac{M-N}{M}\cdot \frac{a_{N+1} + \cdots + a_M}{M-N}, $$ the product of something tending to 1 and something which is $\epsilon/3$-close to $\ell$, by choice of $N$. So for $M$ large enough, it will be $\epsilon/2$-close to $\ell$.

The first summand tends to 0. So by choosing $M$ large enough, you can get the entire expression $\epsilon$-close to $\ell$.

  • $\begingroup$ does |$a_k - l|< \epsilon/3$ denote the partial sum converging? you change some of the variables. For example, you are writing $a$ instead of the s in the fractions. Just to make it clear. Thanks $\endgroup$ – Mahidevran Feb 5 '15 at 2:39
  • $\begingroup$ I used $a_k$ for the sequence, and $\sigma_k$ for the averages $\endgroup$ – Matthew C Feb 5 '15 at 2:52

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.