6
$\begingroup$

The Wikipedia page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-analytic_smooth_function) proves that $$f(x) = \begin{cases} \exp(-1/x), & \mbox{if }x>0 \\ 0, & \mbox{if }x\le0 \end{cases}$$ is a non-analytic smooth function. But I don't understand why the fact that "the Taylor series of $f$ at the origin converges everywhere [where does "everywhere" mean here?] to $0$" implies the Taylor series converges to $0$ when $x>0$? Can someone explain this in greater detail? I guess there should be a gap in my understanding of power series.

$\endgroup$
3
  • 7
    $\begingroup$ The Taylor series of that function at 0 is $0+0x+0x^2/2!+0x^3/3!+\cdots$, with all terms zero. Therefore it converges for all $x$, that is, «everywhere». $\endgroup$ Jan 30 '15 at 19:24
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @MarianoSuárez-Alvarez If a real analytic function is 0 in an open set in $\mathbb{R}$, can I say it's 0 on the whole real line by this argument? $\endgroup$
    – Vladimir
    Jan 30 '15 at 19:46
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Yes. That is a basic fact of analytic functions. $\endgroup$ Jan 30 '15 at 20:03
4
$\begingroup$

One can form the Taylor series associated to $f(x)$ centered at $0$, $$ \sum_{n = 0}^\infty \frac{f^{(n)}(0)}{n!} x^n \tag{1}.$$ We can talk about the convergence or diververgence of the power series expansion in $(1)$ as a function of $x$, and this is possibly different than considering the behavior of the function $f(x)$ itself. In this case, it happens to be that $f^{(n)}(0) = 0$ for all $n \geq 0$, so the power series is identically zero for all $x$. This is what is meant in the article by "the Taylor series... converges everywhere to 0."

This shows that $f$ is not analytic, as $f$ does not agree with its Taylor series centered at $x=0$ in any open neighborhood of $0$. [Namely, $f(x) > 0$ for $x > 0$, whereas the Taylor series is identically zero].

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$
  1. The power series $$\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} 0 \, x^n = 0 + 0x + 0x^2 + 0x^3 + \dots$$ clearly converges to zero for any value of $x$. That is, if we call this power series $g(x)$, then we can say $g(x) = 0$ for any $x \in \mathrm{I\!R}$ (another way of saying this is that the radius of convergence for this series is infinite; the important thing to notice is that this is true for any value of $x$).

  2. $\vphantom{^{\Big|}}$ The Taylor series of a function $h(x)$ about $x = c$ is given by $$\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \tfrac{h^{(n)}(c )}{n!}(x-c)^n = h(c) + \tfrac{h'(c )}{1!}(x-c)+ \tfrac{h''(c )}{2!}(x-c)^2 + \dots \;,$$ i.e. the coefficients are determined by the derivatives of $f(x)$. Analytic functions are equal to their Taylor series expansion wherever the series converges (i.e. over the interval of convergence).

  3. $\vphantom{^{\Big|}}$ The derivatives (of all order) at $c = 0$ of the function $f(x)$ given in the OP are all zero (the referenced Wiki page provides a proof), i.e.: $$f^{(n)}(0) = 0, \qquad n = 1, 2, 3, \dots$$ So the coefficients of its Taylor series centred at $c = 0$ are given by:
    $$\frac{f^{(n)}(0)}{n!} = \frac{0}{n!} = 0, \qquad n = 1, 2, 3, \dots $$ That is, we have shown that the Taylor series for $f(x) = 0 + 0x + 0x^2 + 0x^3 + \dots$.

That is, the Taylor series expansion for $f(x)$ about $c = 0$ is clearly equal to the power series $g(x)$ discussed above (1.), which we observed has infinite interval of convergence (i.e. converges for all real $x$).

However, it is also clear that $f(x)$ is not equal to its Taylor series, because clearly: $$ f(x) = \begin{cases}0, & x \leq 0 \\ e^{-1/x} & x > 0 \end{cases} \quad \mathbf{{\color{red} \neq }} \quad 0 + 0x + 0x^2 + \dots $$


It sounds to me as though you were conflating the centre about which we make the expansion $x = c$ and the value at which we evaluate the function $x$ in $f(x)$ or $g(x)$.

The point of the example is not that $f(x)$ doesn't have an accurate series representation of some sort (over some interval) around any point, but that the expansion about $c = 0$,$^{\color{red}{1}}$ is well-defined for all values of $x$, and yet it is not equal to $f(x)$. In other words, there do exist well-defined, convergent Taylor expansions of a function $f(x)$ that do not converge to $f(x)$.

If this feels kind of contrived / unsatisfying / underwhelming, you're not alone :). From what I understand, it is an important result, but hard to appreciate if your experience is limited to analytic functions.

$^{\color{red}1}$: It is possible to find an accurate series expansion around other points, although they wouldn't be "Taylor" series (because the powers of $x$ wouldn't be positive integers).

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.