3
$\begingroup$

If $f (x)$ is an irreducible polynomial over a perfect field $F$, then $f (x)$ has no multiple zeros$(1)$.

But I have also $2$ theorems, which are contradictory to the statement above

$\textbf{Theorem1}$: Let $f(x)$ be an irreducible polynomial over a field $F$. If $F$ has characteristic $p$, then $f(x)$ has a multiple zero only if it is of the form $f(x)=g(x^p)$ for some $g(x)$ in $F[x]$.

for example $f(x)=x^{4p}+3x^{2p}+x^p+1$, then $g(x)=x^4+3x^2+x+1$

$\textbf{Theorem2}$: Every finite field is perfect.

So every field of characteristic $p$ is finite, hence perfect, combined with $(1)$, Theorem $1$ is wrong, or not ?

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Not every field of characteristic $p$ is finite. $\endgroup$ – Matt Samuel Jan 27 '15 at 13:19
  • $\begingroup$ There must be something wrong with theorem 1. Irreducible polynomials with multiple roots? $\endgroup$ – Git Gud Jan 27 '15 at 13:21
  • $\begingroup$ @Git Gud maybe roots are in some extension of $F$ $\endgroup$ – implicit lee Jan 27 '15 at 13:22
  • $\begingroup$ @GitGud these exist. $\endgroup$ – Matt Samuel Jan 27 '15 at 13:22
  • $\begingroup$ I am not sure what your example is meant to illustrate. In any case, $f$ is not irreducible; indeed, $g(x^p) = g(x)^p$ (in this case). $\endgroup$ – quid Jan 27 '15 at 13:33
3
$\begingroup$

$\newcommand{\F}{\mathbf{F}}$I believe you need to consider the following classical example.

Let $x, y$ be independent indeterminates over the field $\F$ with $p$ elements, $p$ a prime. Consider the fields $E = \F(y)$ of rational functions over $\F$ in the indeterminate $y$, and its subfield $K = \F(y^{p})$.

Then one can prove that the polynomial $$ f(x) = x^{p} - y^{p} \in K[x] $$ is irreducible in $K[x]$. And clearly $f(x) = g(x^{p})$, where $g(x) = x - y^{p}$.

Note that $f(x) = (x-y)^{p}$ has the single root $y$ in $E$, with multiplicity $p$.

The latter fact allows for an easy proof of the irreducibility of $f(x)$ in $K[x]$. In fact, if $h(x) \in K[x]$ is a monic, proper, non-constant divisor of $f(x)$, then since $K[x]$ is a UFD $h(x) = (x - y)^{k}$ for some $0 < k < p$. The coefficient of $x^{k-1}$ in $h(x)$ is $- k y$. Thus $-k y \in K$, and thus $y \in K$, which is easily seen to be a contradiction.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for the example, The problem was that I assumed :$char(p)\implies$finite. $\endgroup$ – implicit lee Jan 27 '15 at 14:09
  • $\begingroup$ @implicitlee, you're welcome. $\endgroup$ – Andreas Caranti Jan 27 '15 at 14:18
2
$\begingroup$

There is no problem. There is just no irreducible polynomial over a finite field of the form $g(x^p)$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.