Intuition behind the derivative of dirac delta function

Let me first begin what I mean by saying the intuition behind the " $\delta'(x)$ ". For example the smooth approximations of the delta function looks like the following: (Left:the smooth approximation of $\delta(x)$ Right:the smooth approximation of $\delta'(x)$)

And by using my intuition I can understand why $$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}f( \bar{x} )\delta(x-\bar{x}) \mathrm{d}\bar{x}=f(x)$$ because I can say that the delta function fires whenever $x=\bar{x}$ and picks up the value of $f(x)$ at that point and when I integrate over all values of x, I get my function f(x) back. In other words it is like building the function $f(x)$ from thin sticks, which has the same hight as the value of the function. (Although I know that this explanation is nowhere near mathematical, it helps me and others to understand -whatever that means- the concept easier.) When I learned about the derivative of the delta function and its following property I was utterly shocked: $$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}f(\bar{x})\delta'(x-\bar{x}) \mathrm{d}\bar{x}=f'(x)$$

Because no matter how long I think about the subject I was unable to build a correct intuition about this distribution. My question is this: Can you explain me intuitively why the derivative of the delta function gives arise to a derivative?

PS: I know why this is true mathematically (integrating by parts and so on).

• You mean $f(\bar{x})$ in the integrals, right? – Hans Lundmark Jan 27 '15 at 11:17
• That is correct. Sorry for the typo – Gonenc Mogol Jan 27 '15 at 11:22
• That is not a property of the derivative of the delta but, essentially, it's definition. – Mariano Suárez-Álvarez Jul 30 '16 at 19:41
• (similarly, what you say you can understand about the Delta function is exactly its definition.) – Mariano Suárez-Álvarez Jul 30 '16 at 19:47

Suppose the spikes in the smooth approximation to $\delta'(x)$ are located at $x=-h$ and $x=h$.
When $\bar{x} \approx x+h$, the smooth approximation to $\delta'(x-\bar{x})$ will be large and positive, so the integral will roughly pick up "something large" times $f(x+h)$. Similary, for $\bar{x} \approx x-h$, the integral will pick up the same large factor times $f(x-h)$, but with the opposite sign. So if that large factor turns out to be of the magnitude $\frac{1}{2h}$, the integral will be roughly $$\frac{f(x+h)-f(x-h)}{2h} = \frac{\bigl(f(x) + h \, f'(x) + O(h^2)\bigr) - \bigl(f(x) - h \, f'(x) + O(h^2)\bigr)}{2h} ,$$ which tends to $f'(x)$ as $h \to 0$.
• Hmm, that's true... But they have a width of the order of $h$ which should compensate for that. (It's the same thing that happens for $\delta$ itself; the smooth approximation has a height of order $1/h$, but the integral still doesn't pick up $\frac{1}{h} \cdot f(0)$, only $h \cdot \frac{1}{h} \cdot f(0)$, since the width of the peak is of order $h$.) – Hans Lundmark Jan 28 '15 at 7:04
Use the nascent delta function based on the hat function: $$\delta_h(x) = \begin{cases} 0 & |x|\geq h \\ x/h^2 + 1/h & -h \leq x \leq 0 \\ -x/h^2 + 1/h & 0 \leq x \leq h \end{cases}.$$ The derivative of this nascent delta function is $1/h^2$ on $[-h,0],$ $-1/h^2$ on $[0,h],$ and 0 everywhere else. So $$\int_{-h}^{h} \delta_h'(x)f(x) \,dx = \int_{-h}^{0} \frac{f(x)}{h^2} \,dx + \int_{0}^{h} \frac{-f(x)}{h^2} \,dx = - \frac{F(h) - 2F(0) + F(-h)}{h^2}$$ where $F$ is the antiderivative of $f.$ The limit of the rightmost term as $h\rightarrow 0$ is the negative second derivative of $F$ at 0, that is $-f'(0).$
To understand the origin of the higher order derivatives of the Dirac delta function, you need to use the normal distribution based nascent delta function: $$\delta_h(x) = \frac{1}{h\sqrt{\pi}} \exp(-x^2/h^2).$$ In a computer algebra system, compute $$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \delta_h^{(n)}(x-a) x^k \,dx$$ for some integer $n\gt 1$ and some integer $k \geq n.$ The answer will be $$(-1)^n k! / (k-n)! a^{k-n} + \text{terms containing positive powers of h}$$ that is, $(-1)^n$ times the $n$th derivative of $x^k$ evaluated at $a$ in the limit $h\rightarrow 0.$