2
$\begingroup$

I'm working on a proof and I'm having trouble relating definitions

I want to prove that if f is uniformly continuous, then if a sequence $ {a_n} $ is Cauchy, $ {f(a_n)} $ is Cauchy.

So if $ f $ is uniformly continuous, then for all $ \epsilon>0 $ there exists a $ \delta>0 $ such that $ d(x,y)<\delta $ implies $ d(f(x),f(y))<\epsilon $

And by definition, a sequence $ a_n $ is Cauchy if for $ \epsilon>0,$ there exists a natural number $ N_1 $ such that for all $ m,n>N_1, d(a_m,a_n)<\epsilon. $

How can I show that $ f(a_n) $ must be Cauchy?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I don't understand the changes. You assume $f$ is uniformly continuous, but at the same time, you're trying to prove $f$ is uniformly continuous. $\endgroup$ – kobe Jan 26 '15 at 1:25
  • $\begingroup$ you're right,sorry $\endgroup$ – jestina Jan 26 '15 at 1:36
  • $\begingroup$ No problem, jestina. $\endgroup$ – kobe Jan 26 '15 at 1:40
0
$\begingroup$

Assume $f$ is uniformly continuous, and let $(a_n)$ be a Cauchy sequence in your space. Given $\varepsilon > 0$, we may choose, by uniform continuity of $f$, a $\delta > 0$ such that for all $x, y$, $d(x,y) < \delta$ implies $d(f(x),f(y)) < \varepsilon$. Since $(a_n)$ is Cauchy, there exists a positive integer $N$ such that $d(a_m,a_n) < \delta$ for all $m,n \ge N$. Hence, if $m, n \ge N$, then $d(a_m,a_n) < \delta$, which implies $d(f(a_m),f(a_n)) < \varepsilon$. Since $\varepsilon$ was arbitrary, $(f(a_n))$ is Cauchy.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.