4
$\begingroup$

This is Exercise 2.3.1 from Achim Klenke: »Probability Theory — A Comprehensive Course«.

Exercise: Let $(X_n)_{n\in N}$ be an independent family of $\mathrm{Rad}_{1/2}$ random variables (i.e., $\mathbf{P}[X_n = −1] = \mathbf{P}[X_n = +1] = \frac{1}{2}$) and let $S_n = X_1 + \dots + X_n$ for any $n \in \mathbb{N}$. Show that $\limsup_{n\rightarrow\infty} S_n = \infty$ almost surely.

I can't solve that one.

My thoughts so far: Ok, $A:=\bigl\{\limsup_{n\rightarrow\infty} S_n = \infty \bigr\} = \bigl\{\inf_{n\geq 1}\sup_{\nu\geq n} S_\nu = \infty\bigr\} $ is in the tail field $A\in\mathcal{T}\bigl((X_n)_{n\in\mathbb{N}}\bigr)$. Because $\sup_{\nu\geq n} S_\nu$ is monotonically decreasing, $A$ happens exactly when $A_n := \bigl\{\sup_{\nu\geq n} S_\nu = \infty\bigr\}$ happen for all $n\in\mathbb{N}$. But since $A_{n+1}$ implies $A_n$ (the supremum is monotonically decreasing) and $A_{n+1}^c$ implies $A_{n}^c$ (if $\sup_{\nu\geq n+1} S_\nu$ is finite, $\sup_{\nu\geq n} S_\nu$ will still be finite), we get $A_n = A_{n+1}$ and inductively that $A_1 = A_{n}$.

Now, By Kolmogorov’s $0-1$ Law, $\mathbf{P}[A]\in\{0, 1\}$. So we must show that $\mathbf{P}[A^c] = \mathbf{P}[ A_1^c] < 1$. $$A_1^c = \biguplus_{m\in\mathbb{Z}} \Bigl\{\sup_{\nu\geq 1} S_\nu = m \Bigr\} \, .$$ It seems very plausible that all $\mathbf{P}\biggl[\Bigl\{\sup_{\nu\geq 1} S_\nu = m \Bigr\}\biggr]=0$ for all $m\in\mathbb{Z}$, but how do I prove that?

Thank you!


Ok, I don't know if what I've written is helpful or even right (you can disregard it if you want). The question is:

How do I prove the exercise above?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Do you know martingales? $\endgroup$ – saz Jan 22 '15 at 17:25
  • $\begingroup$ No, not yet.... $\endgroup$ – Ystar Jan 22 '15 at 18:06
  • $\begingroup$ It seems to me that $\mathbf P\{\sup_{\nu\geqslant1} S_\nu = m\}$ should be equal for all $m$, and the only way for a countable sum of real numbers to be finite is if they are all zero. But I'm not sure. $\endgroup$ – Math1000 Jan 22 '15 at 19:32
  • $\begingroup$ @Math1000: I think we would need to prove that, it isn't that obvious. For example $\mathbf{P}[\{\sup_{\nu\geq1}\frac{1}{\nu} S_\nu = m\}]$ would surely be different for different $m\in\mathbb{Z}$. $\endgroup$ – Ystar Jan 23 '15 at 4:35
  • $\begingroup$ Yeah, that's why I said I wasn't sure. Just an idea I had. $\endgroup$ – Math1000 Jan 23 '15 at 12:46
5
+50
$\begingroup$

You are on a good start. We already know that $\mathbb{P} (A) \in \{0, 1\}$, but how do we decide which one?

First remark: a sequence $(X_n)$ is in $A^c$ if and only if its sum is bounded from above, i.e., if and only if there exists $N \in \mathbb{N}$ such that $S_n \leq N$ for all $n$.

Now, let's use the symmetry of the random walk. The map $(X_n)_{n \in \mathbb{N}} \mapsto (-X_n)_{n \in \mathbb{N}}$ preserve the distribution of the sequence of random variables (they are still independent, and have the same distribution for all $n$). Hence,

$$\mathbb{P} (\limsup_n S_n = + \infty) = \mathbb{P} (\limsup_n -S_n = + \infty) = \mathbb{P} (\liminf_n S_n = - \infty).$$

If I write $B$ the event $\{\liminf_n S_n = - \infty\}$, then $\mathbb{P} (A) = \mathbb{P} (B) \in \{0, 1\}$. Let $C$ be the complement of $A \cup B$. Then $C$ is exactly the set of sequences which are bounded from above and from below, so the set of bounded sequences. Hence,

$$C = \bigcup_{N \in \mathbb{N}} C_N,$$

where $C_N = \{|S_n| \leq N \ \forall n \in \mathbb{N} \}.$

I sum up. If $\mathbb{P} (C) = 0$, then $\mathbb{P} (A \cup B) = 1$. But $A$ and $B$ have the same probability, so $\mathbb{P} (A) \geq 1/2$. Since $\mathbb{P} (A) \in \{0, 1\}$, this forces $\mathbb{P} (A) = 1$. Hence, I only need to prove that $\mathbb{P} (C) = 0$, that is, that each $C_N$ has measure $0$.

Fix $N$. Remark that if there is a sequence of $2N+1$ elements of $(X_n)$ which have the same sign, then the sequence cannot belong to $C_N$.

For $k \geq 0$, let $D_k$ be the event $\{(X_{(2N+1)k}, X_{(2N+1)k+1}, \cdots, X_{(2N+1)k+2N} \text{ all have the same sign} \}$. Then all the $(D_k)$ are independent, and $\mathbb{P} (D_k) = 2^{-2N - 1}$ for all $k$. By Borel-Cantelli's lemma, almost surely, a sequence will lie in an infinity of $D_k$'s, and thus in at least one of them. Since being in any $D_k$ precludes being in $C_N$, this yields $\mathbb{P} (C_N) = 0$.

Since this is true for all $N$, we get $\mathbb{P} (C) = 0$, and from there, $\mathbb{P} (A) = 1$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I think there is a little problem, since $A \notin\mathcal{T}\bigl((X_n)_{n\in\mathbb{N}}\bigr)$, see for example math.stackexchange.com/questions/1231129/…. Only the Cesàro means $\frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^{n}X_i$ are tail-measurable, but not $\sum_{i=1}^{n}X_i$. $\endgroup$ – user144921 Mar 27 '17 at 16:16
  • $\begingroup$ @user144921: I would agree for $M \in \mathbb{R}$, but here, $M = + \infty$, and the event $A$ is indeed a tail event. The event "the sequence $S_n$ takes arbitrarily large values" does not depend on any finite number of $X_i$'s. $\endgroup$ – D. Thomine Mar 28 '17 at 11:01
0
$\begingroup$

By the CLT, we have the convergence in distribution $$ \frac{S_n}{\sqrt{n}}\Longrightarrow N(0,1). $$ Thus since $\sqrt{n}\nearrow \infty$, it follows that $\limsup_n S_n=\infty$ a.s.


More details: Since $\lim_{n\to\infty}\mathbb P(S_n>\sqrt{n})=\int_1^{\infty}e^{-x^2/2}>0$, it follows that $\mathbb P(\limsup_n S_n=\infty)>0$. Thus by the Kolmogorov 0-1 Law, $\limsup_n S_n=\infty$ a.s.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.