0
$\begingroup$

Is there a proof to show that a mapping from an arbitrary topological space to an arbitrary Hausdorff space (excluding metric spaces) has a unique limit point? Therefore, the only properties to be used are:

1) inverse continuous mappings of open sets are open sets

2) any two points in a Hausdorff space can have disjoint open neighborhoods

3) any point in a Hausdorff space is a close set

Hints will be appreciated.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ What is the definition of "limit point of a mapping"? $\endgroup$ – Krish Jan 18 '15 at 18:43
  • $\begingroup$ I think the OP means an (existing) limit of $f$ at some point $x$. An wants to know why the "an" could be replaced by "the" in case of Haussdorfness of the target of $f$. $\endgroup$ – Olórin Jan 18 '15 at 18:47
1
$\begingroup$

In a general topological space, the appropriate notion of convergence rely on the notion of filter base.

Let $X$ a set. A filter $F$ on $X$ is a set of non-empty subsets of $X$ such that $A,B\in F$ implies $A\cap B\in F$, and $A\in F$ and $A'\subseteq A$ implies $A'\in F$. A filter base on $X$ is a set $F$ of non empty subsets of $X$ such that for each $A,B\in F$, there exists $C\in F$ such that $C\subseteq A\cap B$. (In particular $A\cap B\not=\varnothing$.) Note that a filter is a base filter. (The reciprocal is false in general.)

If $X$ is a topological space and if $x_0\in X$, the set $V(x_0)$ of neighbourhoods of $x_0$ in $X$ is a filter. Any fundamental system of neighbourhoods of $x_0$ in $X$ is a filter base on $X$.

If $X$ is a topological space, if $Y\subseteq X$ and if $x_0 \in \overline{Y}$, then the set $F_{x_0}(Y)$ of subsets of $Y$ of the form $Y\cap V$ where $V$ is a neighbourhood of $x_0$ in $X$ is a filter on $Y$. ($Y\cap V\not=\varnothing$ especially because $x_0 \in \overline{Y}$.) If $Y = X$ you recover the previous definition.

The more general case of limit of a function is the following : let $X$ be a set and $F$ a filter base on $X$, and $f : X\rightarrow Y$ a map where $Y$ is a topological space, and $l\in Y$. One says that $f$ tends to $l$ along $F$ if for each neighbourhood $V$ of $l$ in $Y$, there exists a $B\in F$ such that $f(B)\subseteq V$. Then, we have the unicity theorem :

Theorem. Let $X$ be a set and $F$ a filter base on $X$, and $f : X\rightarrow Y$ a map where $Y$ is an Hausdorff topological space, such that $f$ has a limit along $F$. Then this limit is unique

Proof Let $l,l'\in Y$ be limits of $f$ along $F$. As $Y$ is Hausdorff, you can find two neighbourhoods $V$ resp. $V'$ of $l$ resp. $l'$ in $Y$ such that $V\cap V'= \varnothing$. Then there exists $B,B'\in F$ such that $f(B)\subseteq V$ and $f(B')\subseteq V'$. As $F$ is a filter base, there is a $B''\in F$ included in $B\cap B'$, then $f(B'')\subseteq V\cap V'$. As $B''\not=\varnothing$ (an filter is constitued of non-empty sets...) necessarily $V\cap V'\not= \varnothing$, a contradiction.

Now, take $X = Y = \mathbf{R}$. Thanks to the previous notions, we can handle the following notions in the same way, thanks to (different filter bases) :

  • $\lim_{x\rightarrow x_0} f(x)$ (this nototion is used in the definition of continuity at $x_0$)

  • $\lim_{x\rightarrow x_0, x\not = x_0} f(x)$ (this notion is used in the definition of limit of a fucntion at some point)

$\lim_{x\rightarrow x_0} f(x) = l$ means that $f$ as limit $l$ along the filter (a filter is a filter base, remember) $V(x_0)$, whereas $\lim_{x\rightarrow x_0, x\not = x_0} f(x) = l$ means that $f$ has limit $l$ along the filter base $F_{x_0}(Y)$ with $Y = \mathbf{R}\backslash\{x_0\}$. (These are in fact definitions)

Last remark : $x_0 = 0$ and if $f$ is the map equal to zero on $Y$ and $1000$ at $x_0$, one should take care of the fact that $\lim_{x\rightarrow x_0} f(x)$ does not exist because $f$ si not continuous at $x_0$, whereas $\lim_{x\rightarrow x_0, x\not = x_0} f(x)$ does and is equal to $0$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Btw, remark that this proof is valid for metric spaces as well. Haussorfness is NOT a metric property, but a topological one, as it simply means that the diagonal in the fiber product $X\times_Y X$ is closed (topological property) in the fiber product $X\times_Y X$. (Here I noted $f : X\rightarrow Y$ the map.) The fiber product $X\times_Y X$ is just the subset of $X\times X$ consisting in couples $(x,x')$ such that $f(x) = f(x')$. $\endgroup$ – Olórin Jan 18 '15 at 18:49
  • $\begingroup$ How does the fact that "As $l,l'$ are limits of $f$ at a point $x$" show that "you can find a neighbourhood $U$ (resp. $U'$) of $x$ such that $f(U)\subseteq V$ (resp. $f(U')\subseteq V'$)."? $\endgroup$ – Student Jan 18 '15 at 20:20
  • $\begingroup$ By definition, $f : X \rightarrow Y$ converges to $l\in Y$ at $x\in X$ if and only if for each neighbourhood $V$ of $l$ in $Y$ there exists a neighboorhoud $U$ of $x$ in $X$ such that $f(U)\subseteq V$. Think of same definition it the case where $X = Y = \mathbf{R}$ with the usual topology... $\endgroup$ – Olórin Jan 18 '15 at 20:21
  • $\begingroup$ Here is a counter example. Consider the mapping $f : [-1,1] \rightarrow R$and $f(x) = x^2$ for all $x \not= 0$ and $f(0) = 1000$. Then as $x \rightarrow 0$ $f(x) \rightarrow 1000$ and so 1000 is a limit point. But no open neighbourhood of $0$ can be mapped to a subset of the point 1000. $\endgroup$ – Student Jan 18 '15 at 20:23
  • $\begingroup$ What you have stated is the condition that $f$ is continuous. In this case it need not be continuous. $\endgroup$ – Student Jan 18 '15 at 20:25

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.