I have seen sources claim that $SO^+(1,3) \cong SU(2) \times SU(2)$, but have seen others claim that only their Lie algebras are isomorphic.

  1. Is it true that $SO^+(1,3) \cong SU(2) \times SU(2)$?
  2. If not, is $SO^+(1,3)$ isomorphic to some quotient of $SU(2) \times SU(2)$?
  3. Is the analogous result true for their Lie alebras, i.e. $\mathfrak{so}^+(1,3) \cong \mathfrak{su}(2) \oplus \mathfrak{su}(2)$, or something similar?
  4. Generally, when can you go from a product group isomorphism to a corresponding result for Lie algebras, or vice versa?

I'm led to believe there is some isomorphism of this form since (I think) $$SO^+(1,3) \cong PSL(2,\mathbb{C}), \quad SL(2,\mathbb{C}) \cong SO(4), \quad SO(4) \cong SU(2) \times SU(2)/\{\pm I\}.$$


$SO^+(3,1)$ is the so-called restricted Lorentz group, which is the identity component of the Lorentz group $SO(3,1)$. It is a six-dimensional real Lie group, which is not simply connected.

  1. Since $SO^+(1,3)$ is not compact, but $SU(2)\times SU(2)$ is compact, the groups cannot be isomorphic as real Lie groups.

  2. We have $SO^+(3,1)\simeq SL(2,\mathbb{C})/\mathbb{Z}_2\simeq SU(2)_{\mathbb{C}}/\mathbb{Z}_2$, i.e., the complexification of the restricted Loretz group satisfies $$SO^+(3,1)_{\mathbb{C}}\simeq (SU(2)_{\mathbb{C}}\times SU(2)_{\mathbb{C}})/\mathbb{Z}_2.$$

  3. In the same way, $\mathfrak{so}^+(3,1)_{\mathbb{C}}\simeq \mathfrak{su}(2)_{\mathbb{C}}\oplus \mathfrak{su}(2)_{\mathbb{C}}\simeq \mathfrak{sl}_2(\mathbb{C})\oplus \mathfrak{sl}_2(\mathbb{C})$.

| cite | improve this answer | |
  • $\begingroup$ How would these answers change if I replaced $SO^+(1,3)$ with $SO(1,3)$? $\endgroup$ – UtterlyConfused Jan 19 '15 at 13:22
  • $\begingroup$ For the Lie algebra it would not matter, because we have $\mathfrak{so}^+(3,1)=\mathfrak{so}(3,1)$. $\endgroup$ – Dietrich Burde Jan 19 '15 at 15:46
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Is $SO(3,1)_\mathbb{C} \cong SU(2)_\mathbb{C} \times SU(2)_\mathbb{C}$? $\endgroup$ – UtterlyConfused Jan 20 '15 at 11:07
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Yes, it is. The complexification of $SO(3,1)$ is $SL(2,\mathbb{C})\times SL(2,\mathbb{C})$. $\endgroup$ – Dietrich Burde Jan 21 '15 at 20:33
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ No, it is the direct product. $\endgroup$ – Dietrich Burde Dec 15 '18 at 12:00

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.