# How to show that “Uniformly continuous implies continuous”? [closed]

Assuming that a function f is uniformly continuous, and starting from the ϵ-δ definition of continuity, how does one prove that it is also continuous on the real numbers?

Thanks.

## closed as off-topic by zarathustra, Jeel Shah, Etienne, Swapnil Tripathi, Mark BennetJan 13 '15 at 21:48

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

• "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – zarathustra, Jeel Shah, Swapnil Tripathi, Mark Bennet
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

• If you use the epsilon delta definition, there is only one answer: it is obvious. – Mister Benjamin Dover Jan 13 '15 at 20:15
• Just cover up the "uniformly" part. – Alexander Gruber Jan 13 '15 at 20:24
• This question appears to be off-topic because it is too obvious to be a question – Etienne Jan 13 '15 at 20:56
• @Laters wrong claims, yeah sure. Not even worth to discuss. – Aaron Maroja Jan 13 '15 at 23:22
• This is the most baffling comment chain I have ever read on this site. – Eric Stucky Jan 14 '15 at 12:04

Let $f: X \to \mathbb{R}$ be uniformly continuous. Then for any $\epsilon > 0$ given there exists $\delta > 0$ such that $x,y \in X$,

$$|x - y| < \delta \Rightarrow |f(x) - f(y)|<\epsilon$$

In particular fix $a \in X$ arbitraly, then

$$|x - a| < \delta \implies |f(x) - f(a)| < \epsilon$$

for every $a \in X$ f is continuous.

An example in which $f$ is continuous but not uniformly continuous is $f(x) = \frac{1}{x}$, where $X = \mathbb{R}^+$ can you show why?

Added: Here is a hint to start. Let $0 <\epsilon<1$, then for every $\delta > 0$ chosen we may take a natural number $n > \frac{1}{\delta}$ and set $x = \frac{1}{n}$ and $y = \frac{1}{2n}$. What is the contradiction?

• Feel free to ask. – Aaron Maroja Jan 13 '15 at 20:41

Uniform continuity (of $f(x)$ on $A$): For every $\epsilon>0$ there is $\delta$ such that if $|x-y|<\delta$ then $|f(x)-f(y)|<\epsilon$.

while

Continuity (of $f(x)$ at $a\in A$): For every $\epsilon>0$ there is $\delta$ such that if $|x-a|<\delta$ then $|f(x)-f(a)|<\epsilon$.

Given $\epsilon>0$ then, by uniform continuity, there is $\delta$ such that for all $x,y\in A$ such that $|x-y|<\delta$ implies that $|f(x)-f(y)|<\epsilon$. In particular if we take $y=a$ we get that for all $x\in A$ such that $|x-a|<\delta$ then necessarily $|f(x)-f(a)|<\epsilon$. This last is the definition of continuity.

The key observation is that the definition of uniform continuity becomes the definition of continuity when you look to a particular point $y=a$.