Whittaker and Watson mention that when the invariants $g_2, g_3$ of Weierstrass $\wp$ function are real and such that $g_2^3 - 27g_3^2 > 0$, and if $2\omega_1$ and $2\omega_2$ are its periods then the function takes real values on the perimeter of the parallelogram with vertices $0,\omega_1,-\omega_2,-\omega_1-\omega_2$.

I am not able to understand why $\wp$ takes real values. Can someone help?

  • $\begingroup$ That's §20.32, ex.2 which presumes from ex.1 that $g_2,g_3$ are real. $\endgroup$ – ccorn Jun 18 '15 at 20:35
  • $\begingroup$ @ccorn Indeed as I told you the invariants must be real, I am editing the question and adding the hypothesis. Also what is the reference of the book where the exercise is taken?? $\endgroup$ – Alonso Delfín Jun 18 '15 at 21:28
  • $\begingroup$ Whittaker & Watson: A Course of Modern Analysis. Merchant Books, 2nd edition 1915. They actually talk about a rectangle in §20.32 ex.2 (p. 437) after having requested the reader to establish purely real/imaginary periods as part of ex.1. $\endgroup$ – ccorn Jun 18 '15 at 23:06

Late answer, but here it is why.

If $g_2, g_3 \in \mathbb{R}$ and $g_2^3-27g_3^2>0$ it can bee seen that the half periods are of the form $\omega_1=\alpha$ and $\omega_2=i \beta$ with $\alpha, \beta \in \mathbb{R}$.

This essentially does the trick since it is easily seen by a direct computation that if $\wp(z)=\wp(z|\alpha, i \beta)$ then \begin{equation} \overline{\wp(z)}=\wp\left(\overline{z}\right) \tag{1} \end{equation} Now take $z \in \{ iy, \ \alpha+iy, \ x, \ x+i \beta : x,y \in \mathbb{R}\}$.

i): If $z=iy$ with $y \in \mathbb{R}$, by (1) it follows that $\overline{\wp(z)}=\overline{\wp(iy)}=\wp\left(\overline{iy}\right)=\wp(-iy)$, but since $\wp$ is even then $\wp(-iy)= \wp(iy)$, thus indeed $$ \overline{\wp(z)}=\wp(iy)=\wp(z), \ \text{hence} \ \wp(z) \in \mathbb{R} $$ ii): If $z=\alpha + iy$ with $y \in \mathbb{R}$, again by (1), $\overline{\wp(z)}=\overline{\wp(\alpha+iy)}=\wp\left(\overline{\alpha + iy}\right)=\wp(\alpha-iy)$, but $2\alpha$ is a period of $\wp$, that gives $\wp(\alpha-iy)= \wp(\alpha-iy-2\alpha)=\wp(-(\alpha+iy))$, again being $\wp$ even we have $\wp(-(\alpha+iy))=\wp(\alpha+iy)$, therefore $$ \overline{\wp(z)}=\wp(\alpha+iy)=\wp(z), \ \text{hence } \ \wp(z) \in \mathbb{R} $$ iii): If $z=x$ with $x \in \mathbb{R}$, (1) gives that $\overline{\wp(z)}=\overline{\wp(x)}=\wp(\overline{x})=\wp(x)=\wp(z)$, then of course $\wp(z) \in \mathbb{R}$

iv): Finally when $z=x + i\beta$ with $x \in \mathbb{R}$, by (1), $\overline{\wp(z)}=\overline{\wp(x+i\beta)}=\wp\left(\overline{x + i\beta}\right)=\wp(x-i\beta)$, since $2i\beta$ is a period of $\wp$ then $\wp(x-i\beta)= \wp(x-i\beta+2i\beta)=\wp(x+i\beta)$, therefore again $$ \overline{\wp(z)}=\wp(x+i\beta)=\wp(z), \ \text{hence } \ \wp(z) \in \mathbb{R} $$

Thus indeed $\wp$ takes real values in all the parallelograms generated by the half periods $\omega_1$ and $\omega_2$, as wanted.

  • $\begingroup$ @ccorn the case I am using is when te invariants $g_2$ and $g_3$ are real, this is the only case when $\wp$ is real in the whole boundary of the parallelogram generated by the half periods. I am making an edit to clarify this. $\endgroup$ – Alonso Delfín Jun 18 '15 at 20:37
  • $\begingroup$ I noticed that shortly after commenting here, which is why I switched to commenting the question instead. Sorry for the irritation. $\endgroup$ – ccorn Jun 18 '15 at 23:16
  • $\begingroup$ @ccorn no worries ! I'm glad you take interest in my answer $\endgroup$ – Alonso Delfín Jun 19 '15 at 0:01
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Thank you Alonso for your help. This point is important for a problem at hand. I am wondering if you would be interested to collaborate on it. If you wish to explore, can you send me an email on dr.amey.joshi@gmail.com? $\endgroup$ – Amey Joshi Jun 20 '15 at 2:19

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.