3
$\begingroup$

Right now I'm working on a set of questions and I came across a two-parter that confused me a bit with the way it was asked. The question is simply put as such:

Write the statements below in symbolic logic.
   a. Everybody loves somebody.
   b. Somebody loves everybody.

Would the way to rewrite this be a simple as using existential and universal quantifiers? Such that a. would be translated to

"∀x, where x is a person, ∃ person x they love."

And b. would be translated to

"∃x such that x loves ∀x."

Is this a proper way to answer the question? Any help is appreciated.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ You might want to define $L(x,y)$ to mean that $x$ loves $y$ $\endgroup$ – Mark Bennet Dec 31 '14 at 23:42
  • $\begingroup$ Another problem that been hasn't mentioned with your formulation: you reuse variables, which is a Very Bad Idea. (In particular, in general your sentences wouldn't be considered syntactically correct.) $\endgroup$ – Steven Stadnicki Dec 31 '14 at 23:47
  • $\begingroup$ Here's an obligatory cartoon on this very issue: dilbert.com/strips/comic/2001-04-19 $\endgroup$ – KCd Jan 1 '15 at 0:42
5
$\begingroup$

You have the right ideas, basically, but there is some more work to get the statements into symbolic logic.

Let $L(x,y)$ be the relation "$x$ loves $y$". Then we get:

$$a.\quad ∀x \, ∃y \, L(x,y)$$

$$b.\quad ∃x \, ∀y \, L(x,y)$$

(The exact punctuation depends on the logical system.)

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Ah so by defining a variable L(x,y) I can essentially skip the unneeded wordy answer I originally came up with? $\endgroup$ – Johnathan Scott Dec 31 '14 at 23:44
  • $\begingroup$ @JohnathanScott: Yes. In fact, such a relation (not a "variable": $x$ and $y$ are variables) is needed to use actual symbolic logic. The "wordy" forms are only half-way there. $\endgroup$ – Rory Daulton Dec 31 '14 at 23:45
  • $\begingroup$ Wonderful. Thanks so much for your help! $\endgroup$ – Johnathan Scott Dec 31 '14 at 23:46
0
$\begingroup$

The phrase "everybody loves somebody" can be translated to "every person x loves some person y" but notice that I said "Person" therefore you have to declare that x and y are both a person. The correct translation would be: ∀𝑥∃𝑦(P(x)^P(y))->L(x,y) And if you were to translate this to a language that makes more sense to a computer you would say "for every x and some y, such that x and y are a person (not saying they are equal or different) there is an x that loves y"

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.