2
$\begingroup$

Given an Euclidean Space and vectors $a_1, a_2, \ldots a_k, b_1, b_2, \ldots b_n$.

Is it true that $V(a_1, a_2, \ldots , a_k, b_1, b_2, \ldots , b_n) \leq V(a_1, a_2, \ldots , a_k) \cdot V( b_1, b_2, \ldots , b_n)$ ?

EDIT: $V(a_1,a_2,…,a_k,b_1,b_2,…,b_n)$ is volume in k+n dimensional parallelogram, and the other V's are in k and n dimensional parallelogram, respectively.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ What do you mean by $V$? $\endgroup$ – PhoemueX Dec 30 '14 at 16:59
  • $\begingroup$ Volume of parallelogram span by vectors. $\endgroup$ – Jerry Johanson Dec 30 '14 at 17:07
  • $\begingroup$ Do you mean $V(a_1, a_2, \ldots , a_k, b_1, b_2, \ldots , b_n)$ is the "volume" (measure) in $k+n$ dimensional space, and the other $V$'s are in $k$ and $n$ dimensional space, respectively? $\endgroup$ – Rory Daulton Dec 30 '14 at 18:13
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, you're right. $\endgroup$ – Jerry Johanson Dec 30 '14 at 18:23
0
$\begingroup$

It seems the following.

The answer is positive and it follows from generalized Hadamard inequality for Gram determinant. The proof is in Chapter IX, $\S$5 of "The theory of matrices" by F. R. Gantmacher. There are also translations “Matrix theory”, 1 (1959) and “The theory of matrices” 1, (1977) published by Chelsea.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.