3
$\begingroup$

I considered simplifying $\sqrt {1+\sqrt 5}$.

So I started $(a+b \sqrt 5)^2 = 1 + \sqrt 5$.

This gave me $a\color{blue}{^2} + 5b^2 =1 , 2ab = 1$ so the result was

$ \sqrt{1+\sqrt 5} = \sqrt{1/2 - i} + \dfrac{\sqrt 5}{\sqrt{2 - 4i}}.$

I continued in the same spirit : $(a_2+b_2 i)^2 = 1/2 - i. $

$a_2^2 - b_2^2 = 1/2, 2a_2b_2 = -1.$ This gave me :

$ \sqrt{1+\sqrt 5} = \dfrac{\sqrt{1+\sqrt 5}}{2} - \frac{1}{4} (\sqrt 5 - 1)(\sqrt{1+\sqrt 5})\color{blue}i +\dfrac{\sqrt 5}{\sqrt{2 - 4i}}\tag1$

I was a bit surprised by the self-similarity.

I got the feeling of " periodic " or " fractal " , like running in circles.

It this normal to get this kind of self-similarity when the initial radical cannot be rewritten in simpler shorter form ( without complex numbers or nesting ) ?

Are they ways to compute or theorems to know about just how many steps it takes to get the self-similarity ?

Does this imply that the number of nontrivial non-nested expressions for a real radical is Always finite ?

edit

Perhaps this edit clarifies a bit what I meant.

Basicly the only identities and substitutions for identities we can have are :

$ \sqrt{1+\sqrt 5} = \sqrt{1/2 - i} + \sqrt{1/2 + i}$

$ \sqrt{1/2+ i} = \dfrac{\sqrt{1+\sqrt 5}}{2} - \frac{1}{4} (\sqrt 5 - 1)(\sqrt{1+\sqrt 5})i$

$ \sqrt{1/2- i} = \dfrac{\sqrt{1+\sqrt 5}}{2} + \frac{1}{4} (\sqrt 5 - 1)(\sqrt{1+\sqrt 5})i$

And no more than those 3. Or 2 if we do not count conjugates as seperate.

Now I suspect this mysterious number 2 is no coincidence ;

Conjecture

If a nested root form containing only sqrts , positive integers and additions (thus no divisions or substractions ) is given that cannot be simplified within the same ring then the amount of identities ( as in the example above , ignoring conjugates ) is at most the amount of sqrt's in the expression.

In this case 2 sqrt's => 2 identities.

edit

comment

A similar thing happens with $\sqrt{5+\sqrt 3}$. You end up with a $\sqrt{10+2\sqrt 22}$ term and when you go on you end up with $\sqrt{5+\sqrt 3}$ again.

Here $\sqrt{10+2\sqrt 22}$ takes on the " role " of $\sqrt{1/2 + i}$ but this examples demonstrates that the phenomenon can stay within the reals too.

These examples are fairly easy to check and in that sense they may appear trivial , but there must be more behind this. The same thing happens for cuberoots for example , and that gives us a mimimum polynomial of degree 9 which is much less well understood then degree 4.

Similar things happen if we use Bring radicals.

Although intuitive and easy to check any particular example by basic algebra , group and ring theory ... The basic framework is unclear to me. I do not think Galois theory alone explains it completely.

I gave a bounty but without succes.


$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ How do you mean simplify the expression? (layman here ;) ) $\endgroup$ – Chinny84 Dec 25 '14 at 23:43
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ I assume the OP is referring to the fact that, sometimes, $\sqrt{a + b \sqrt{c}}$ can be rewritten as $d + e \sqrt{f}$, although the OP should clarify.... $\endgroup$ – Hurkyl Dec 25 '14 at 23:46
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ This just seems like an unholy mess to me, what do I know though? $\endgroup$ – Suzu Hirose Dec 25 '14 at 23:59
  • $\begingroup$ Also notice that the square root is a multi-valued function on $\mathbb{C}$ - what do you mean by $\sqrt{1/2-i}$? $\endgroup$ – Jack D'Aurizio Dec 26 '14 at 0:02
  • $\begingroup$ You might want to look at this: math.stackexchange.com/questions/720114/… $\endgroup$ – Pauly B Dec 26 '14 at 1:16
15
$\begingroup$

I can't quite follow your computations, or your notion of "self-similarity", but there is no simpler form of $\alpha=\sqrt{1+\sqrt 5}$.

$\alpha$ is a root of the polynomial $x^4-2x^2-4$, which is irreducible over the integers and therefore also over $\mathbb Q$. Thus, $x^4-2x^2-4$ is the unique monic minimal polynomial of $\alpha$ over $\mathbb Q$. Since it has degree 4, there is no way to write $\alpha$ with just one square root sign, because all numbers that arise in that way have minimal polynomials of degree 2 or 1.

We might still hope to write $\alpha$ with two square roots as $\sqrt p+\sqrt q+r$ for rational $p$, $q$ and $r$ -- that would arguably be simpler than nesting the two square roots. Unfortunately, that is not possible.

The minimal polynomial of $\sqrt p+\sqrt q$ (assuming neither of $p$, $q$, or $p/q$ are rational squares) is $$\tag{*} x^4-2(p+q)x^2+(p-q)^2$$ If $\alpha$ is of this form, we would have $2(p+q)=2$ and $(p-q)^2=-4$, but the latter equation clearly has no real solutions for $p$ and $q$. We do get $$ \sqrt{1+\sqrt5} = \sqrt{1/2+i}+\sqrt{1/2-i} $$ where in each case we select the square root with positive real part -- but that doesn't really look simpler to me (though your mileage may vary).

And we can't hope for $\alpha$ to have the form $\sqrt p+\sqrt q+r$ either, because then $\beta=\alpha-r$ would be $\sqrt p+\sqrt q$, but if we substitute $\alpha=\beta+r$ in $\alpha^4-2\alpha^2-4=0$ we get something with a nonzero third-degree term (unless $r=0$), which can't possibly have the form $(\text{*})$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I'm not sure, but I think what he means by the "self-similarity" and "fractal" part is that he sees similar expressions in the LHS and RHS. Kindly look at my comment/answer below. $\endgroup$ – Tito Piezas III Dec 26 '14 at 3:49
4
$\begingroup$

(Too long for a comment.)

I think what he means is that since from $(1)$,

$$ \sqrt{1+\sqrt 5} = \dfrac{\sqrt{1+\sqrt 5}}{2} - \frac{1}{4} (\sqrt 5 - 1)(\sqrt{1+\sqrt 5}) i +\dfrac{\sqrt 5}{\sqrt{2 - 4i}}\tag1$$

Or,

$$ \dfrac{\sqrt{1+\sqrt 5}}{2} = -\frac{\sqrt 5-1}{4}\Bigr(\sqrt{1+\sqrt 5}\Bigl) i +\dfrac{\sqrt 5}{\sqrt{2 - 4i}}$$

So when he "... was surprised by the self-similarity", I assume it was because he saw that part of the RHS can be expressed in terms of the LHS,

$$ A = \color{blue}{\frac{1-\sqrt 5}{2} A i +\dfrac{\sqrt 5}{\sqrt{2 - 4i}}}$$

and we can iterate the "rule" for $A$ as,

$$ A = \frac{1-\sqrt 5}{2} \left(\color{blue}{\frac{1-\sqrt 5}{2} A i +\dfrac{\sqrt 5}{\sqrt{2 - 4i}}}\right) i +\dfrac{\sqrt 5}{\sqrt{2 - 4i}}$$

and again,

$$ A = \frac{1-\sqrt 5}{2} \left({\frac{1-\sqrt 5}{2} \left(\color{blue}{\frac{1-\sqrt 5}{2} A i +\dfrac{\sqrt 5}{\sqrt{2 - 4i}}}\right) i +\dfrac{\sqrt 5}{\sqrt{2 - 4i}}}\right) i +\dfrac{\sqrt 5}{\sqrt{2 - 4i}}$$

and so on to as many levels as one wishes, with $A = \frac{\sqrt{1+\sqrt 5}}{2}$, hence his "fractal".

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Yes I noticed this. Thanks ! But I edited and tried to explain more clearly. $\endgroup$ – mick Dec 28 '14 at 19:21
3
$\begingroup$

I don't really understand what you are doing regarding self-similarity and the introduction of $i$. But as far as writing $\sqrt{1+\sqrt{5}}$ as $a+b\sqrt{5}$, since you are using that form in the first place, I would assume that you mean $a,b$ rational.

But as you have found (with a typo?), $a^2+5b^2=1$ and $2ab=1$, so

$$\begin{aligned} a^2+5b^2&=1\\ 4a^2b^2+20b^4&=4b^2\\ 1+20b^4&=4b^2\\ 20b^4-4b^2+1&=0\\ b^4-\frac15b^2+\frac1{20}&=0\\ 0<\left(b^2-\frac1{10}\right)^2+\frac1{25}&=0\end{aligned}$$

So there is no rational $b$ that works. So writing in the form $a+b\sqrt{5}$ is not going to make anything simpler, since you'd have to use irrational, (non real even) $b$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.