From PDE Evans, 2nd edition, pages 25-26.

THEOREM 2 (Mean Value Formulas for Laplace's equation). If $u \in C^2(U)$ is harmonic, then $$u(x)=\def\avint{\mathop{\,\rlap{-}\!\!\int}\nolimits} \avint_{\partial B(x,r)}u \, dS=\def\avint{\mathop{\,\rlap{-}\!\!\int}\nolimits} \avint_{B(x,r)} u \, dy$$ for each ball $B(x,r)\subset U$.

Proof. 1. Set $$\phi(r) := \avint_{\partial B(x,r)} u(y) \, dS(y) = \avint_{\partial B(0,1)} u(x+rz) \, dS(z).$$ Then $$\phi'(r)=\avint_{\partial B(0,1)} Du(x+rz) \cdot z \, dS(z)$$ and consequently, using Green's formulas from §C.2, we compute \begin{align}\phi'(r) &= \avint_{\partial B(x,r)} Du(y) \cdot \frac{u-x}r dS(y) \\ &= \avint_{\partial B(x,r)} \frac{\partial u}{\partial \nu} dS(y) \\ &= \frac rn \avint_{B(x,r)} \Delta u(y) \, dy = 0.\end{align}

Hence $\phi$ is constant, and so $$\phi(r)=\lim_{t \to 0} \phi(t) = \lim_{t \to 0} \avint_{\partial B(x,t)} u(y) \, dS(y) = u(x).$$

The proof continues on but I'm stopping here for this question I need to ask:

Can anyone explain the last line? I understand that $\phi$ is constant since we established that $\phi'(r)=0$ for all harmonic functions $u$. Hence, this is why we can say $\phi(r)=\lim_{t\to 0} \phi(t)$. But how can we establish the last equality, that is, $$\lim_{t \to 0} \avint_{\partial B(x,t)} u(y) \, dS(y)=u(x)?$$



$$ \avint_{\partial B(x,t)} \, dS(y) = 1 $$ and therefore

$$ \bigl| u(x) - \avint_{\partial B(x,t)} u(y) \, dS(y)\bigr| = \bigl| \avint_{\partial B(x,t)} (u(x) - u(y)) \, dS(y) \bigr| \le \avint_{\partial B(x,t)} |u(x) - u(y)| \, dS(y) \\ \le \max_{y \in \partial B(x,t)} \{ |u(x) - u(y)| \} \quad . $$

This converges to zero for $t \to 0$ because $u$ is continuous at $x$.

  • $\begingroup$ Now, I get that $u$ is continuous, but if we are dealing with $x,y$, does $u$ also need to be uniformly continuous? I still can't understand the justification in the last line of your answer. $\endgroup$ – Cookie Dec 22 '14 at 21:05
  • $\begingroup$ @dragon: $u$ is uniformly continuous on each compact set that is not needed here. For fixed $x$ and $\varepsilon > 0$ there is a $\delta > 0$ such that $|u(x)−u(y)| < \varepsilon $ for all $y$ with $|y - x| < \delta$. If follows that the last expression is less than $\varepsilon$ for $ 0 < t < \delta$. $\endgroup$ – Martin R Dec 22 '14 at 21:08
  • $\begingroup$ @dragon: I do not know what your $\alpha(n)$ is. But anyway, I am sure that the definition is equivalent to $\int f \, dS $ divided by $\int 1 \, dS$. The average of a constant function is always defined to be that constant. $\endgroup$ – Martin R Dec 22 '14 at 21:13
  • $\begingroup$ Maybe that definition is equivalent to what you stated. Evans seems to present complicated notation all the time in the book; I too have no idea what $\alpha(n)$ means, but I think it probably has something to do with volume of a ball in higher dimensions. $\endgroup$ – Cookie Dec 22 '14 at 21:14
  • $\begingroup$ Do you know lebesgue points? If yes, this is just the result of Lebesgue points. $\endgroup$ – spatially Dec 23 '14 at 2:49

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.