Find the fraction with integers for the numerator and denominator, where the decimal expansion is $0.11235.....$

The numerator and denominator must be less than $100$.

Find the fraction.

I believe I can use generating functions here to get $1+x+2x^2+3x^3+5x^4+.....$, but I do not know how to apply it.

  • $\begingroup$ What's the next digit, $8$? $\endgroup$ – barak manos Dec 20 '14 at 20:21
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Good rational approximations can be found using partial fractions. $\endgroup$ – Mark Bennet Dec 20 '14 at 20:31
  • $\begingroup$ @CameronBuie It was not given. $\endgroup$ – Math is Life Dec 20 '14 at 20:33
  • $\begingroup$ @barakmanos: Not sure. It was not given. $\endgroup$ – Math is Life Dec 20 '14 at 20:34
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Is the fractional term supposed to be the simple stringing together of the Fibonacci numbers, i.e., 0.112358132134...? $\endgroup$ – Mico Dec 21 '14 at 8:56

Like you hint, we can observe that the value $$0.11235955056\ldots = \sum_{k = 1}^{\infty} 10^{-k} F_k,$$ where $F_k$ is the $k$th Fibonacci number (with the convention that $F_0 = 0$, $F_1 = 1$), is simply the value of the series $$F(x) := \sum_{k = 1}^{\infty} F_k x^k = x + x^2 + 2x^3 + 3x^4 + 5x^5 + 8x^6 + 13x^7 + \cdots$$ at $x = \frac{1}{10}$.

Hint Using the defining recurrence relation $$F_{k + 2} = F_{k + 1} + F_k$$ (and the above convention) gives that $F(x)$ satisfies $$F(x) = x + x F(x) + x^2 F(x).$$

Rearranging gives that on the open interval of convergence of the series, which turns out to be $(-1/\phi, 1/\phi)$---where $\phi$ is the Golden Ratio, and which in particular contains the value $\frac{1}{10}$ of interest)---we have $$F(x) = \frac{x}{1 - x - x^2}.$$ Thus, the series has value $$F\left(\tfrac{1}{10}\right) = \frac{\left(\frac{1}{10}\right)}{1 - \left(\frac{1}{10}\right) - \left(\frac{1}{10}\right)^2} = \color{#bf0000}{\boxed{\frac{10}{89}}} .$$ Since this is a rational number, its decimal expansion repeats: $$0.\overline{1123595505617977528089887640449438202247191}.$$

  • $\begingroup$ @FlybyNight yes, that behavior is obvious and expected -- 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13 and then the 8 and 13 overlap to give a 9 in the decimal expansion in place of the 8. $\endgroup$ – oldrinb Dec 20 '14 at 21:22

Continued fractions: \begin{align} \frac{11235}{100000}&=\frac{2247}{20000}\\ &=\cfrac{1}{8+\cfrac{2024}{2247}}\\ &=\cfrac{1}{8+\cfrac{1}{1+\cfrac{223}{2024}}}\\ &=\cfrac{1}{8+\cfrac{1}{1+\cfrac{1}{9+\cfrac{1}{13+\cfrac{2}{17}}}}}\\ &=\cfrac{1}{8+\cfrac{1}{1+\cfrac{1}{9+\cfrac{1}{13+\cfrac{1}{8+\cfrac{1}{2}}}}}}\\ &=[0;8,1,9,13,2] \end{align} The first convergent is $1/8$; the second convergent is $$ \cfrac{1}{8+1}=\frac{1}{9}; $$ the third convergent is $$ \cfrac{1}{8+\cfrac{1}{1+\cfrac{1}{9}}}=\cfrac{1}{8+\cfrac{9}{10}}=\frac{10}{89}; $$ The fourth convergent can be computed to $131/1166$ (see this continued fraction calculator)


An exhaustive search (by computer) of all fractions with numerator and denominator $< 100$ shows there is only one whose decimal representation starts 0.11235: $$ \frac{10}{89} $$

The decimal expansion continues $\ldots 955056179775\ldots$ (I haven't bothered finding aprogram that can calculate enough that we can see the period), that's completely impossible to guess- I would call the question poorly worded.

  • $\begingroup$ To save anyone from having to reach for a calculator, the first many digits of the expansion goes $0.1123595505617977\dots$. The question of if there is a better method than brute force remains. We could clearly see that for it to work for some $\frac{p}{q}$, we would need $8.5p < q<9p$ and so $p\leq 11$, reducing cases to test to less than 18 $\endgroup$ – JMoravitz Dec 20 '14 at 20:37
  • $\begingroup$ @Henrik: I am guessing that the decimal representation would represent Fibonacci numbers, but I'm not sure.. $\endgroup$ – Math is Life Dec 20 '14 at 20:39
  • $\begingroup$ The period is $44$ since $m = 44$ is the smallest positive integer such that $10^m \equiv 1 \pmod{89}$. WolframAlpha gives the decimal expansion to enough digits. $\endgroup$ – JimmyK4542 Dec 20 '14 at 20:40
  • $\begingroup$ @MathisLife: I would be surprised if the decimal representation of the Fibonacci numbers were rational. $\endgroup$ – Cameron Buie Dec 20 '14 at 20:40

These are fractions $f$ with $11235/100000\le f<11236/100000.$ A direct, if slow, method for counting these would be $$ \sum_{d=1}^{100}\left\lfloor\frac{100000d}{11235}\right\rfloor-\left\lfloor\frac{100000d}{11236}\right\rfloor $$



Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.