Let $Y$ be an affine variety of $\mathbb{A}^n$ and it contains $0$. Think of $\mathbb{A}^n \times \mathbb{P}^{n-1}$ as a quasi-projective variety. Define a closed subset of $\mathbb{A}^n \times \mathbb{P}^{n-1}$, call it $X$, by the zero locus of the polynomial $f=\sum_{i,j}(x_i y_j - x_jy_i)$. We define the morphism $\varphi: X\to \mathbb{A}^n$ given by projection onto its first component. The blow-up of $Y$ (at $0$) is given by $B=\overline{\varphi^{-1}(Y\setminus \{0\})}$ (closure taken in either $X$ or $\mathbb{A}^n$, it does not mater because $X$ is closed).
We claim that $B$ is birational to $Y$. Because $K(B)\simeq K(B \setminus \varphi^{-1}(0))$ and $K(Y) \simeq K(Y\setminus \{0\})$. However, $\varphi$ induces an isomorphism between $B\setminus \varphi^{-1}(0)$ and $Y\setminus \{0\}$, in particular $B$ is birational to $Y$.
I am trying to understand why $\varphi$ induces an isomorphism between those two open sets. I forgot what the reason was, just remember it was something pretty simple.