2
$\begingroup$

I am looking at General Topology notes on Alternative Ways of Defining Topology and come up with this questions:

If $\iota : \mathscr P (X) \to \mathscr P (X)$ is an operation of interior, then $\tau = \{A \in \mathscr P(X) \ : \ \iota (A) = A \}$ is a set of open sets in $X$.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

For your convenience, a map $\iota : \mathscr P (X) \to \mathscr P (X)$ has to meet the followings to be an operation of interior:

($\mathscr I_1) : \iota (\emptyset) = (\emptyset ) $

($\mathscr I_2) : \forall A \in \mathscr P(X), \iota (A) \subseteq A$

($\mathscr I_3) : \forall A \in \mathscr P(X), \iota (\iota(A)) = \iota( A)$

($\mathscr I_4) : \forall A, B \in \mathscr P(X), \iota (A \cap B) = \iota (A) \cap \iota (B)$

For your convenience again, $\tau \subseteq \mathscr P (X)$ is a set of open sets in $X$ if $\tau$ satisfies the following conditions:

$(\mathscr O_1)$ : $\emptyset \in \mathscr \tau$

$(\mathscr O_2)$ : $X \in \tau$

$(\mathscr O_3)$ : If $\{ U_i \}_{i \in I} \in \tau$, then $\cup _{i \in I} \in \tau$

$(\mathscr O_4)$ : If $U, V \in \tau$, then $U \cap V \in \tau$

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

And here are my two questions:

(1) It is easy to solve $(\mathscr O_1)$ and $(\mathscr O_4)$ since they are straightforward. But when dealing with $(\mathscr O_2)$, I have to come up with $\iota (X) = X$ and I completely am stuck here, please help.

(2) For $(\mathscr O_3)$, suppose that $T_i = \{A_i \in \mathscr P(X) : \iota (A_i) = A_i \}$. Can I use $\iota ( \cup T_i ) = \cup \iota (T_i)$ because it is just a natural outcome of union of sets, or do I have to prove it first? Or perhaps there is another way without using it?

Thank you for your time and help.

EDIT ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I have been responded that there is maybe a mistake in the definition. Perhaps the error is here: On the next page of the same note, there is definition for Operation of Closure as follow:

$(\mathscr C_1) : \kappa (\emptyset ) = \emptyset $

$(\mathscr C_2) : $ For $\forall A \in \mathscr P(X), A \subseteq \kappa (A)$

$(\mathscr C_3) : $ For $\forall A \in \mathscr P(X), \kappa (\kappa (A)) = \kappa (A)$

$(\mathscr C_4) : $ For $\forall A, B \in \mathscr P(X), \kappa (A \cup B) = \kappa (A) \cup \kappa (B)$.

Since the Operation of Interior is a dual of Operation of Closure, I have been speculating perhaps there is a typo on $(\mathscr I_1)$, that it should not be $\iota (\emptyset) = \emptyset$ but it should be $\iota (X) = X$ instead. But if that is indeed the typo, I am now facing another dilemma: Can you solve the $(\mathscr I_1)$? Please help and as always, thank you so very much for your time and help.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Note that $\mathscr I_1$ is an immediate consequence of $\mathscr I_2$ $\endgroup$ – Hagen von Eitzen Dec 13 '14 at 22:12
1
$\begingroup$

It should indeed say $\iota(X) = X$ as $\mathscr{I}_1$. See also this forum post. The duality is clear from defining $\kappa(A) = X\setminus \iota(X\setminus A)$. Then $\kappa$ is a closure operator (using your correct closure axioms) iff $\iota(X)$ is an interior operatator (with the corrected definition). Of course the reverse also goes, defining $\iota(A) = X\setminus \kappa(X \setminus A)$.

The duality is clear if we think of $\iota(A)$ as the largest open subset of $A$, and $\kappa(A)$ as the largest closed subset containing $A$, and knowing closed and open sets are related by complements.

Also, $\iota(\emptyset) = \emptyset$ is immediate from $\iota(A) \subseteq A$, as the only subset of $\emptyset$ is $\emptyset$. And the axioms are chosen to be independent: there are "almost"-interior operators that satisfy all but one of the conditions, for all conditions can appear as the odd one out. Taking $\iota(A) = \emptyset$ satisifies all but the correct $\mathscr{I}_1: \iota(X) = X$, as one example. There are other examples for the other conditions, showing them all to be necessary.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Brandsme : Thank you! Now I am done with this problem! I have up-voted your answer. Thank you again. $\endgroup$ – Amanda.M Dec 15 '14 at 3:04
0
$\begingroup$

With the definition as you cite them, the claim is wrong. Indeed, $\iota(A):=\emptyset$ fulfills your definition of interior, but it makes $\iota(X)\ne X$ (unless $X=\emptyset$).

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks, but how do I go about solving $\mathscr O_2$? Thanks again. $\endgroup$ – Amanda.M Dec 13 '14 at 22:25
  • $\begingroup$ @A.Magnus As I said, you cannot show $\mathscr O_2$ because it is not necesssarily true. Maybe double-check your definitions. $\endgroup$ – Hagen von Eitzen Dec 13 '14 at 22:38
  • $\begingroup$ The definition of $T_i$ doesn't make sense. You need to start with a collection $T \subseteq \tau$ and show that $\iota ( \cup T ) = \cup T$. Think about what $(\mathscr I_4)$ tells you when $A \subseteq B$. $\endgroup$ – David Hartley Dec 13 '14 at 22:55
  • $\begingroup$ @HagenvonEitzen : To Hagen von Eitzen: Honestly, I have been suspecting that there is a typo on the definition of $(\mathscr I_1)$, for that reason I have posted an Edit. Could you please take another look, please? Thank you very much for your time and help. $\endgroup$ – Amanda.M Dec 14 '14 at 3:30
  • $\begingroup$ @DavidHartley : I made the $T_i$ definition myself, the mistake is completely mine. Thanks for your pointing out. $\endgroup$ – Amanda.M Dec 14 '14 at 3:37

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.