Good confusion-avoiding notation for iterated commutators? I am doing some complicated and tedious calculation on iterated commutators. A typical term in my calculation looks like $$[x_a,[[[x_b,x_c]-x_d,x_e],[x_f,x_g]]]\text{.}$$
(I am considering commutators on Lie algebras so the minus sign $-$ is well defined here.)
In the notation above there is no ambiguity; but when I have dozens of terms like that it looks horrible and a mistake in calculation is almost inevitable. I have simplified the notation a little bit by forgetting the $x$'s and write the commutator as $$[a,[[[b,c]-d,e],[f,g]]]\text{,}$$ but it still looks confusing. Not sure if I should continue to simplify it and simply write $$[a[[([bc]-d)e][fg]]]$$ instead. I tried to use physical papers as my draft papers and also opened a rich text document to note down the calculation; but both ways look awkward and it is difficult for me to "see" when should I cancel two terms (under some conditions) or use the Jacobi's identity. 
So my question is:

Is there any "smart" notation that I can use for calculation like this
  and make the calculation less fallible?

I am not referring to writing for publishing, but just for calculation on one's own draft paper.
 A: I think that you're going to have some cluttered-looking formulas no matter what.
However, instead of $[X, Y]$, one could write, say, $\mathcal{L}_X(Y)$.
You could obviously even shorten this to $X(Y)$, like function notation.  If you then switch to exponent notation for functions (as, $f(x) = x^f$), and especially if you're willing to mix these notations, then (assuming I parsed it right!) your sample formula could become, for instance:
$$
([f, g]^{[[b, c] - d, e]})^a
$$
which to my eye is slightly more readable than what you had.
Obviously this could cause a bunch of other problems for you! For instance: (1) you may want to reserve exponential notation for, well, exponents. (2) Visually, it switched the order.  So even though $a$ started out way on the left, now it's way on the right.
We could perhaps try to lessen the confusion in both (1) and (2) at once: Write ${}^xy = [x, y]$, so now your formula is
$$
{}^a({}^{[[b, c] - d, e]}[f, g])
$$
You could also use subscripts instead of superscripts, etc.  It's a matter of taste whether something like this is preferable.  Obviously, do whatever works best for you!
