# Is a cube a smooth manifold?

Is the unit square $\partial I^2$ (i.e. the square with vertices $(0,0), (0,1), (1,0), (1,1) \in \mathbb R^2$) a smooth manifold?

I guess it shouldn't be smooth because it has "corners", but i have trouble actually finding an explicit atlas which "makes sense" and which contains two coordinate charts which are not compatible.

• A related question. Feb 7, 2012 at 0:49
• Strictly speaking, it does not make sense to ask whether a topological space "is" a smooth manifold, in the same way that it does not make sense to ask whether a set "is" a group. Being a smooth manifold is a structure that one puts on a topological space (which needs to have the property of being a topological manifold first) in the same way that being a group is a structure that one puts on a set (that is, specifying it requires extra data). Feb 7, 2012 at 0:52
• @QiaochuYuan Aren't both of those question valid if there is a parent object that already has (standard) structure? Feb 7, 2012 at 1:02
• @alex: this is subtle. Certainly it makes sense to ask whether a subset of a group is a subgroup. But the naive way to endow a subspace of a smooth manifold with a smooth structure requires that the subspace be open. Feb 7, 2012 at 1:05
• @Qiaochu I see. Using the specifics of this example, I thought maybe the local homeomorphism to $\mathbb{R}$ could be taken to be a restriction of a linearization of the local homeomorphism to $\mathbb{R}^2$. I see now that how to "linearize" is problematic. Feb 7, 2012 at 1:23

I initially thought this question was about $I^2$, but I can give a definite answer for $\partial I^2$, which is that this question doesn't make sense. Note that as a topological space, $\partial I^2$ is homeomorphic to the unit circle $S^1$ (in particular, it is a topological manifold!), which can be equipped with a smooth structure in a fairly straightforward way (e.g. using the exponential map $e^{ix} : \mathbb{R} \to S^1$). So it's not clear what we would mean by the statement that $\partial I^2$ isn't smooth.
One way to make this intuition precise is to think of $\partial I^2$ as the image of $S^1$ under a continuous map $S^1 \to \mathbb{R}^2$. Then the statement you want is this: no such map can be an injective immersion. (Edit, 12/10/15: An earlier version of this answer claimed that no such map can be smooth. In fact this is false; a counterexample can be constructed by slowing down as you hit each corner using a bump function.)
• Thanks! Out of curiosity, would $I^2 \setminus \partial I^2$ be a smooth submanifold of $\mathbb R^2$? Feb 7, 2012 at 9:02
• Hi, I'm slightly confused as to whether one needs $\delta I^2$ to be diffeomorphic to $S^1$ (not just homeomorphic) for the first paragraph to work? Then again, your second paragraph shows this is not even possible... Feb 6, 2014 at 21:38
• @user: the point of the first paragraph is that the statement "$\partial I^2$ is diffeomorphic to $S^1$" doesn't even make sense a priori because $\partial I^2$ doesn't come with a distinguished smooth structure, in the same way that the statement "brown is bigger than yellow" doesn't even make sense a priori because colors don't come with a distinguished ordering. Feb 6, 2014 at 21:43