4
$\begingroup$

Evaluate the Cauchy Principal Value of $\int_{-\infty}^\infty \frac{\sin x}{x(x^2-2x+2)}dx$

so far, i have deduced that there are poles at $z=0$ and $z=1+i$ if using the upper half plane. I am considering the contour integral $\int_C \frac{e^{iz}}{z(z^2-2z+2)}dz$ I dont know how to input graphs here but it would be intended at the origin with a bigger R, semi-circle surrounding that. So, I have four contour segments.

$\int_{C_R}+\int_{-R}^{-r}+\int_{-C_r}+\int_r^R=2\pi i\operatorname{Res}[f(z)e^{iz}, 1+i]+\pi iRes[f(z)e^{iz},o]$ I think. Ok, so here is where I get stuck. Im not sure how to calculate the residue here, its not a higher pole, so not using second derivatives, not Laurent series. Which method do I use here?

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ $0$ is a removable singularity. $\endgroup$ – hjhjhj57 Dec 10 '14 at 21:15
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ No PV necessary, poles are away from real axis. $\endgroup$ – Ron Gordon Dec 10 '14 at 21:18
  • $\begingroup$ so then, just find the residues and mulitply by $2\pi i$ and @hjhjhj57, since 0 is a removable singularity, I do not need to calculate the residue of that one? just $1+i$? $\endgroup$ – cele Dec 10 '14 at 22:08
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @cele But when you replace $\sin x$ by $e^{ix}$, you introduce a pole at $0$, and then you need to consider the principal value. Apart from the residue at $1+i$, you also need to look at what happens on the small semicirlce around $0$ when its radius tends to $0$. $\endgroup$ – Daniel Fischer Dec 10 '14 at 22:28
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @cele That funny looking $\mathfrak{I}$ means "imaginary part of". $\endgroup$ – user_of_math Dec 11 '14 at 2:49
5
$\begingroup$

Write $\sin{x} = (e^{i x}-e^{-i x})/(2 i)$. Then consider the integral

$$PV \oint_{C_{\pm}} dx \frac{e^{\pm i z}}{z (z^2-2 z+2)} $$

where $C_{\pm}$ is a semicircular contour of radius $R$ in the upper/lower half plane with a semicircular detour into the upper/lower half plane of radius $\epsilon$. For $C_{+}$, we have

$$PV \oint_{C_{+}} dz \frac{e^{i z}}{z (z^2-2 z+2)} = \int_{-R}^{-\epsilon} dx \frac{e^{i x}}{x (x^2-2 x+2)}+ i \epsilon \int_{\pi}^0 d\phi \, e^{i \phi} \frac{e^{i \epsilon e^{i \phi}}}{\epsilon e^{i \phi} (\epsilon^2 e^{i 2 \phi} - 2 \epsilon e^{i \phi}+2)} \\+ \int_{\epsilon}^R dx \frac{e^{i x}}{x (x^2-2 x+2)}+ i R \int_0^{\pi} d\theta \, e^{i \theta} \frac{e^{i R e^{i \theta}}}{R e^{i \theta} (R^2 e^{i 2 \theta} - 2 R e^{i \theta}+2)} $$

For $C_-$, we have

$$PV \oint_{C_{-}} dz \frac{e^{-i z}}{z (z^2-2 z+2)} = \int_{-R}^{-\epsilon} dx \frac{e^{-i x}}{x (x^2-2 x+2)}+ i \epsilon \int_{-\pi}^0 d\phi \, e^{i \phi} \frac{e^{-i \epsilon e^{i \phi}}}{\epsilon e^{i \phi} (\epsilon^2 e^{i 2 \phi} - 2 \epsilon e^{i \phi}+2)} \\+ \int_{\epsilon}^R dx \frac{e^{-i x}}{x (x^2-2 x+2)}- i R \int_0^{\pi} d\theta \, e^{-i \theta} \frac{e^{-i R e^{-i \theta}}}{R e^{-i \theta} (R^2 e^{-i 2 \theta} - 2 R e^{-i \theta}+2)} $$

In both cases, we take the limits as $R \to \infty$ and $\epsilon \to 0$. Note that, in both cases, the respective fourth integrals have a magnitude bounded by

$$\frac{2}{R^2} \int_0^{\pi/2} d\theta \, e^{-R \sin{\theta}} \le \frac{2}{R^2} \int_0^{\pi/2} d\theta \, e^{-2 R \theta/\pi}\le \frac{\pi}{R^3}$$

The respective second integrals of $C_{\pm}$, on the other hand, become equal to $\mp i \frac{\pi}{2} $. Thus,

$$PV \oint_{C_{\pm}} dz \frac{e^{\pm i z}}{z (z^2-2 z+2)} = PV \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dx \frac{e^{\pm i x}}{x (x^2-2 x+2)} \mp i \frac{\pi}{2}$$

On the other hand, the respective contour integrals are each equal to $\pm i 2 \pi$ times the sum of the residues of the poles inside their contours. (For $C_-$, there is a negative sign because the contour was traversed in a clockwise direction.) The poles of the denominator are at $z_{\pm}=1 \pm i$. Thus,

$$PV \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dx \frac{e^{\pm i x}}{x (x^2-2 x+2)} \mp i \frac{\pi}{2} = \pm i 2 \pi \frac{e^{\pm i (1 \pm i)}}{(1 \pm i) (2) (\pm i)} $$

Taking the difference between the two results and dividing by $2 i$, we get that

$$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dx \frac{\sin{x}}{x (x^2-2 x+2)} = \frac{\pi}{2} \left (1+\frac{\sin{1}-\cos{1}}{e} \right ) $$

Note that we may drop the $PV$ because the difference between the integrals removes the pole at the origin.

$\endgroup$
3
$\begingroup$

$\newcommand{\angles}[1]{\left\langle\, #1 \,\right\rangle} \newcommand{\braces}[1]{\left\lbrace\, #1 \,\right\rbrace} \newcommand{\bracks}[1]{\left\lbrack\, #1 \,\right\rbrack} \newcommand{\ceil}[1]{\,\left\lceil\, #1 \,\right\rceil\,} \newcommand{\dd}{{\rm d}} \newcommand{\ds}[1]{\displaystyle{#1}} \newcommand{\dsc}[1]{\displaystyle{\color{red}{#1}}} \newcommand{\expo}[1]{\,{\rm e}^{#1}\,} \newcommand{\fermi}{\,{\rm f}} \newcommand{\floor}[1]{\,\left\lfloor #1 \right\rfloor\,} \newcommand{\half}{{1 \over 2}} \newcommand{\ic}{{\rm i}} \newcommand{\iff}{\Longleftrightarrow} \newcommand{\imp}{\Longrightarrow} \newcommand{\Li}[1]{\,{\rm Li}_{#1}} \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\left\vert\left\vert\, #1\,\right\vert\right\vert} \newcommand{\pars}[1]{\left(\, #1 \,\right)} \newcommand{\partiald}[3][]{\frac{\partial^{#1} #2}{\partial #3^{#1}}} \newcommand{\pp}{{\cal P}} \newcommand{\root}[2][]{\,\sqrt[#1]{\vphantom{\large A}\,#2\,}\,} \newcommand{\sech}{\,{\rm sech}} \newcommand{\sgn}{\,{\rm sgn}} \newcommand{\totald}[3][]{\frac{{\rm d}^{#1} #2}{{\rm d} #3^{#1}}} \newcommand{\ul}[1]{\underline{#1}} \newcommand{\verts}[1]{\left\vert\, #1 \,\right\vert}$

Zeros of $\ds{x^{2} - 2x + 2}$ are given by $\ds{r_{\pm} = 1 \pm \ic=\root{2}\exp\pars{\pm\ic\,{\pi \over 4}}}$.

\begin{align}&\color{#66f}{\large% \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}{\sin\pars{x} \over x\pars{x^{2} - 2x + 2}}\,\dd x} =\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}{1 \over x^{2} - 2x + 2}\,\ \overbrace{\half\int_{-1}^{1}\expo{\ic kx}\,\dd k} ^{\ds{=\ \dsc{\sin\pars{x} \over x}}}\ \,\dd x \\[5mm]&=\half\,\Re\int_{-1}^{1}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} {\expo{\ic\verts{k}x} \over x^{2} - 2x + 2}\,\dd x\,\dd k =\half\,\Re\int_{-1}^{1}2\pi\ic\lim_{x\ \to\ r_{+}}\bracks{\pars{x - r_{+}} {\expo{\ic\verts{k}x} \over x^{2} - 2x + 2}}\,\dd k \\[5mm]&=\pi\,\Re\int_{-1}^{1} {\expo{\ic\verts{k}r_{+}} \over 2r_{+} - 2}\,\dd k ={\pi \over 2}\,\Re\bracks{% \ic\int_{-1}^{1}{\expo{\pars{-1 + \ic}\verts{k}} \over \ic}\,\dd k} =\pi\,\Re\bracks{% \int_{0}^{1}\expo{\pars{-1 + \ic}k}\,\dd k} \\[5mm]&=\pi\,\Re\bracks{\expo{\pars{-1 + \ic}} - 1\over -1 + \ic} =\pi\,\Re{\bracks{\expo{-1}\cos\pars{1} - 1 + \expo{-1}\sin\pars{1}\ic} \pars{-1 - \ic}\over 2} \\[5mm]&={\pi \over 2}\bracks{-\expo{-1}\cos\pars{1} + 1 + \expo{-1}\sin\pars{1}} =\color{#66f}{\large% {\pi \over 2}\bracks{1 + {\sin\pars{1} - \cos\pars{1} \over \expo{}}}} \end{align}

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.