A common example showing that a subring of a Noetherian ring is not necessarily Noetherian is to take a polynomial ring over a field $k$ in infinitely many indeterminates, $k[x_1,x_2,\dots]$. The quotient field is then obviously Noetherian, but the subring $k[x_1,x_2,\dots]$ is not since there is an infinite ascending chain of ideals which never stabilizes.

Is there an instance of a finitely generated Noetherian ring over some ground ring $R$, that has an intermediate ring which is not finitely generated over $R$, and hence not Noetherian either?


marked as duplicate by Lord Shark the Unknown abstract-algebra Oct 27 '18 at 4:24

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

  • $\begingroup$ This is answered by Mariano's answer here. That question did not have a Noetherian condition, but it's clearly satisfied in the example. $\endgroup$ – Dylan Moreland Feb 5 '12 at 22:23
  • $\begingroup$ Oh yeah, Hilbert's basis theorem shows the Noetherian condition. Should I delete this somehow? $\endgroup$ – Emilia Feb 5 '12 at 22:32
  • $\begingroup$ I actually don't know what the interface for asking questions is like, but if you want to then that seems fine: no one has written an answer, or anything. $\endgroup$ – Dylan Moreland Feb 5 '12 at 22:46

To get this question off the unanswered list, I copy Mariano's example from here.

The polynomial ring $k[x,y]$ is Noetherian (by Hilbert's basis theorem), but the subring generated by $\{xy^i:i\geq0\}$ is not finitely generated over $k$.

  • $\begingroup$ Nice, simple example. $\endgroup$ – anomaly Dec 15 '15 at 20:09

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.