4
$\begingroup$

Let cost price of an item be $C$, selling price be $S$. Assume the seller makes a profit.

Then profit would be: $P = S - C$.

Now, what is the formula for calculating Profit Percentage?

  1. $P \% = \dfrac{P}{C} \times 100$
  2. $P\% = \dfrac{P}{S} \times 100$

Which one is right and why?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Apologizing in advance for anti-establishment heresy, this question leads to others relating to the way percentages are calculated. The question is what to use as a divisior when calculating percent change. If you are talking to customers, use S. If you are talking to investors use C (assumeing S>C). To be fair and unbiased, use the modified AGM from Borchardt's algorithm. This allows percent changes to be added and subtracted. So if you raise your price x%, your profit % also increases by x%. P%=100*Ln(S/C). $\endgroup$ – richard1941 Jun 29 '18 at 10:52
3
$\begingroup$

The percentage profit $X$ is defined by

$$X = \left(\frac{\textrm{Amount of money you have at the end}}{\textrm{Amount of money you had at the start}} - 1\right) \times 100$$

Since you have $S$ at the end and $C$ at the start (because that's the money you needed to buy the item) then

$$X = \left( \frac{S}{C} - 1\right)\times 100 = \left(\frac{S-C}{C}\right)\times 100 = \frac{P}{C} \times 100$$


To see why your second decision has to be wrong, consider the case where you buy something for \$1 and sell it for \$1,001, so that $P$=1000. With your first definition,

$$X = 100\times \frac{1000}{1} = 100,000\%$$

which makes sense - you clearly made a huge profit, so you expect your percentage profit to be huge. With your second definition,

$$X = 100\times \frac{1000}{1001} = 99.9\%$$

which is nowhere near big enough.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ given (p/c)*100 what happens if your cost is 0? $\endgroup$ – chovy Nov 12 '13 at 7:07
  • $\begingroup$ You make infinite return. $\endgroup$ – Chris Taylor Nov 15 '13 at 13:57
4
$\begingroup$

They are both right.

The first expresses the profit as a percentage of the cost price. This is the profit mark-up.

The second expresses the profit as a percentage of the sales price. This is the profit margin.

Percentage profit on its own doesn't mean anything unless you are talking mark-up or margin. By convention, in a module I teach, percentage profit means profit mark-up.

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

$C : S = 100 : (100+x) \Rightarrow 100\cdot S=100 \cdot C +C \cdot x \Rightarrow x=\frac {100(S-C)}{C}\Rightarrow x= \frac{100\cdot P}{C}$

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ You say that 1st one is correct, i.e. we should measure the Profit percent wrto the Cost Price. Thank you. $\endgroup$ – Sai Manoj Kumar Yadlapati Feb 3 '12 at 13:36
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @ysaimanojkumar,I guess that it is natural way of thinking... $\endgroup$ – Peđa Terzić Feb 3 '12 at 13:38
1
$\begingroup$

You have stumbled on one of the tools that journalists and politicians use to manipulate statistical evidence: selection of a divisor when calculating percentage change. Using the starting value or the ending value as a divisor results in a difference between an increase or a decrease. For example, if you buy something for 100 and sell it for 200, you have a profit of 100. But if you buy for 200 and sell for 100, you have a loss of only 50%. That is total nonsense that should be purged from public education. A much better divisor would be the average of the starting and ending values; that would make the percent change the same in both directions.

But what if something is bought by a distributor for 100 and sold to a retailer for $200. Then the profit % is 100/150 = 67%. Next, the retailer sells the product for 400. His profit % is also 67%. The sum of these two profits is 133%. But the total profit is the increase from 100 to 400. And the percent profit, using the average as a divisor is 300/250 = 120%. Note the discrepancy!

The discrepancy can be reduced by using the geometric mean as a divisor, and can be totally eliminated by using the modified AGM from Borchardt's algorithm. That leads to the fair and objective caluculation of %P as 100*Ln(S/C). Try this with the extreme example given by Chris Taylor above, and you will get reasonable results!

I am under no illusion that such a practice could ever find its way into the educational establishment. Use this for your own purposes, but when you do school work, always give the teacher the incorrect answer that he expects.

$\endgroup$
-1
$\begingroup$

answer two is right because : Suppose Cost of your product is 5400 Selling price is 8000 then profit is 2600

According to 2nd formula P%=P/S×100 profit % = 2600/8000 X 100 = 32.5%

Let's check profit according to 32.5%

profit = Selling price X profit % /100 8000 X 32.5% / 100 = 2600

hence formula 2nd is right

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Hello, welcome Mathematics.SE! Unfortunately, your answer is not correct; please see the accepted answer for explanation and intuition. It may be advisable to delete your answer, this can be done via the link on the bottom left. $\endgroup$ – Lord_Farin Jun 20 '13 at 13:15
  • $\begingroup$ @Lord_Farin I've imagined you saying that with the Portal's robotic voice. $\endgroup$ – Billy Rubina Jun 20 '13 at 13:26

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.