I am self learning abstract algebra. I want to know which theorems are a must to understand.

Now these are limits I have to deal with (please consider when answering):

  1. I have limited internet access
  2. Few mathematical books written in English are available.
  3. I can not afford to order books from abroad. 

I just want to know what is the core knowledge (theorems, lemmas, etc) of any decent graduate level abstract algebra class.

  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Why not just look at the table of contents (via Amazon or Google book, for example) of some graduate-level abstract algebra books? For that matter, beyond "doing the undergrad stuff more seriously," I don't think there's going to be much in common between everyone's ideal notion of a decent such course (commutative algebra vs. advanced group theory vs. homological algbera vs. category theory, etc.) $\endgroup$ Feb 3, 2012 at 11:46
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ And, of course, the web is full of resources. For example, there's these course notes from Paul Garrett www.math.umn.edu/~garrett/m/algebra/notes/Whole.pdf $\endgroup$ Feb 3, 2012 at 11:52
  • $\begingroup$ @CamMcLeman One of my problems is that each book seems to be in a different branch, I was wondering what would be the fundamental information. I will give your idea a try. $\endgroup$
    – yiyi
    Feb 3, 2012 at 11:58
  • $\begingroup$ I agree with Prof McLeman: most sources for the traditional group/ring/field course are going to hit the same stuff. You'll prefer some books over others, but a list of theorems doesn't really help there. The important thing for you as a student is to gain a feel for the definitions and think about a lot of examples, and while texts are helpful for this I think they're often minimally so. $\endgroup$ Feb 3, 2012 at 14:11
  • $\begingroup$ This is to say that while I sympathize with the limitations you list, the best thing to do might be to pick up some book (my impression is that you can get books not written in English) and start enjoying the material. It is hard to imagine that it won't hit the highlights mentioned in, say, Kannappan's answer. Good luck! $\endgroup$ Feb 3, 2012 at 14:18

3 Answers 3


Assuming you are aiming for a Groups/Rings/Fields, at a level one might expect from someone who has taken a year's undergraduate sequence but not much more:


  1. Definition, lots of examples.
  2. Subgroups, homomorphisms, normal subgroups
  3. Cosets; Lagrange's Theorem.
  4. Group actions.
  5. Permutation groups. Symmetric and alternating groups.
  6. Cayley's Theorem.
  7. The Isomorphism Theorems.
  8. Cauchy's Theorem and the Sylow Theorems.
  9. Abelian groups.
  10. The Fundamental Theorem of Finitely Generated Abelian Groups.


  1. Definition, lots of examples.
  2. Homomorphisms.
  3. Ideals.
  4. The Isomorphism Theorems.
  5. Field of quotients of integral domains.
  6. Polynomial rings.
  7. Euclidean rings, Principal Ideal Domains, Unique Factorization Domains
  8. Gauss's Lemma and polynomials over Unique Factorization Domains.


  1. Field extensions.
  2. Algebraic extensions. Dedekind's Product Theorem.
  3. Primitive Element Theorem.
  4. Separability.
  5. Fundamental Theorem of Galois Theory (finite case).
  6. Solvability by radicals.
  7. Finite fields.

I think Herstein's Topics in Algebra is a good resource, though it is a bit old-fashioned (it has almost nothing on group actions, for example).

With a more time, I would add the following topics:


  1. Introduction to Semigroups.
  2. Semidirect products; extensions.
  3. Jordan-Höder Theorem.
  4. Commutator subgroup; solvability (this will have been covered somewhat when discussing solvability by radicals under Fields; study it in more detail).
  5. Basic results on $p$-groups.
  6. Divisible and reduced abelian groups.
  7. Structure Theorem of Divisible Abelian Groups.
  8. Free groups, free products, free products with amalgamation.
  9. Basics of representation theory of groups.


  1. Jacobson radical.
  2. Wedderburn's Theorem.
  3. Wedderburn-Artin Theory.
  4. Division rings.
  5. Localizations.
  6. Group rings.
  7. Basic theory of modules.
  8. Modules over PIDs.


  1. Inseparable extensions.
  2. Transcendental extensions.
  3. Kummer Theory.
  4. Normal Basis theorem.
  5. Fundamental theorem of Galois Theory (infinite case).

Lang's Algebra is a good resource, but is not easy to learn from. For Ring Theory, Lam's First Course in Noncommutative Ring Theory is very good.

  • $\begingroup$ TOPICS is a book near and dear to my heart-as I've said here many times,it's the book I learned algebra from. I doubt it's that old fashioned that it would be a problem-and the exercises are the best of any standard textbook I know. $\endgroup$ Feb 3, 2012 at 17:22
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Mathemagician1234: My undergraduate courses were from Herstein as well, and I certainly don't feel I was ill-served by them. But I think that having very little on group actions is a serious defect. $\endgroup$ Feb 3, 2012 at 17:46
  • $\begingroup$ I started with Herstein, and I stand by that book to this day. (Not the best ever, but a great start). $\endgroup$
    – davidlowryduda
    Feb 3, 2012 at 17:51
  • $\begingroup$ Isaacs's book seems to be gaining popularity. [These days it is possible to obtain books without paying for them.] It's very "filled out", if that makes any sense. $\endgroup$ Feb 3, 2012 at 19:14
  • $\begingroup$ @Dylan: I've heard good things about Isaac's Group Theory book, though I have not had the leisure of reading it through. However, as I recall it is intended to be a sort of "Second Course in Group Theory" book... But perhaps you mean his abstract algebra book. $\endgroup$ Feb 3, 2012 at 19:42

You leave quite a few restrictions. You don't have books, can't get books, and can't use the internet much. So, there isn't really much for us to tell you. You HAVE to have some form of book. You can't learn from nothing but a list of a few theorems. So, it seems the least restrictive of your list is the internet. Obviously, you can use it some.

By the way, you can't just learn the most important theorems. The rest of the stuff in the book leads up to these theorems and the theorems make no sense, or can not be proven, unless you have all the rest.

This should get you a lot of the basics. But, it's on the internet. As I said before, you basically left no possibilities for help, so I have to delete one of your restrictions.


Other than that, search for undergraduate abstract algebra online. "Intro" or "elementary" are words that tell you it's going to be undergrad level. Here are lecture notes from Hungerford's undergrad book, which is the book I used as an undergrad. If you could at least print this off, or something like it, that would solve the internet access problem.




I am an undergraduate student in Math. I have no idea whatsoever about a graduate level Abstract Algebra course, but, I thought I'll sketch a list of resources one should master before graduate School (in my opinion).

Group Theory:

  • Group action (with as many examples and applications as you can).
  • Sylow's Theorems
  • The concept of semidirect product (with as many examples, and it's use in construction of groups)
  • Lots of examples of groups ($M_n$, $GL_n(\mathbb C)$, $GL_n(\mathbb F_q)$ $SL_n$, $PSL_n$, etc). By this, I mean, as many theorems and non-trivial facts about these groups as you can.
  • Permutation groups (inside out)
  • Free groups
  • Solvable groups (Hall's Theorem), Nilpotent group, Central series

Where Should I learn these from?

Well, this is a question to which there is no right answer always. So, here is my choice not in order .

  1. Dummit and Foote (The Modern encyclopedia of Abstract Algebra)
  2. M.Hall -Theory of Groups
  3. M.Aschbacher-Finite Group Theory

I would like to emphasize that you must have good command over examples and counter examples for exceptions, theorems (in which some hypothesis plays a crucial role) and so on, either from books or through self-Construction.

(P.S.: This is an advice I received from a Senior of mine who is now a Ph.D student and I have edited it suitably (for the forum) and added my own experience through the learning process.)

For other branches of Abstract Algebra, I'd write it up as I get time. Please bear with me!


You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .