1
$\begingroup$

This problem bothers me and probably every other developer in the field of computer graphics ever since. Take any two graphics libraries/frameworks and you can be almost sure that they use a different coordinate system definition. The most famous examples are of course DirectX and OpenGL.

DirectX uses a left-handed system where

positive X = (1, 0, 0) points to the right
positive Y = (0, 1, 0) to the top and
positive Z = (0, 0, 1) to the back.

OpenGL uses a right-handed system where

positive X = (1, 0, 0) also points to the right
positive Y = (0, 1, 0) also to the top but
positive Z = (0, 0, 1) to the front.

To make things even worse, their interpretation of the 16 values of a 4x4 matrix is transposed to each other (row major <-> column major).

Another example would be OpenCV which has also a right-handed system but Y points downwards... its a mess!

Question 1:

How can it be solved in a general way, so that an object defined and transformed in system A appears in the same position/orientation in the other system B from the (independent) position of the viewer (e.g. person in front of the screen)?

I guess one would need the basis vectors of system A (where the object comes from) defined in system B (in which one wants to display it) and setup some linear equation system to solve in order to get a transformation matrix which is also defined in B and apply that to the coordinates of the object.

Question 2:

The same question goes for matrices, which matrix (defined in system B) transforms a transformation defined in system A into a transformation defined in system B so that it has visually the same 'effect'? hopefully its the same matrix as in question A with the exception that one has to transpose the matrix in case the two systems use other interpretations of the 16 values.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ In Question 1, what do you mean by an "object defined and transformed in A"? Is this a point (or set of points) expressed in system A's coordinates? Does this just mean $(a,b,c)$ expressed in $A$ coordinates becomes $(a,b,-c)$ in $B$ coordinates? $\endgroup$ – JohnD Dec 3 '14 at 2:45
  • $\begingroup$ yes, by object i mean a set of 3d points. and in the example case it is true that (a, b, c) in A becomes (a, b, -c) in B. this appears trivial at first but leads to a lot of confusion when it comes to transformations. $\endgroup$ – thalm Dec 3 '14 at 11:23
0
$\begingroup$

After some weeks of research I have compiled all knowledge I could find in this presentation:

Coordinate Systems in 3D Computer Graphics

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.