6
$\begingroup$

Let $A$ be a commutative ring with unity. Prove: Proof every maximal ideal of $A$ is a prime ideal (Hint: Use the fact that $J$ is a maximal ideal iff $A/J$ is a field.)

In the question before this I proved that $J$ is a prime ideal iff $A/J$ is an integral domain. Now, I have what I think is a "pseudoproof" and as such, am not satisfied.

$\rightarrow$ Let $J$ denote an arbitrary maximal ideal of $A$. Since $J$ is a maximal ideal of $A$, $A/J$ is a field. Because every field is an integral domain, $A/J$ is an integral domain. Since $A/J$ is an integral domain, $J$ is a prime ideal. Thus, every maximal ideal $J$ of $A$ is a prime ideal.

Is there another way to prove this directly?

|cite|improve this question
$\endgroup$
10
$\begingroup$

You could always just use the obvious elementary proof, if someone forced you to.

Suppose $ab\in M$ and $a\notin M$. Then $(a,M)=R$, so $1=ax+m$ for some $x\in R$, $m\in M$. ($(a,M)$ denotes the ideal generated by $a$ and $M$, which is equal to the ideal $aR+M$.)

This yields $b=abx+bm\in M$.

|cite|improve this answer
$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ What is that ordered pair, $(a,M)$? Why is it equal to $R$? $\endgroup$ – Al Jebr Dec 2 '14 at 3:26
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ $(a, M)$ is the ideal generated by $a$ and $M$ and it is equal to $R$ because it is larger than the maximal ideal. $\endgroup$ – user157227 Dec 2 '14 at 3:29
  • $\begingroup$ That's a petite proof :D Just so other people don't get confused with notations. (a, M) represents the ideal M + <a> where <a> is ideal general by a and since sum of two ideals is an ideal we have M + <a> as another ideal. @rschweib can you please add a little more explanation so that newbies like me get it in the first glance? $\endgroup$ – router Jan 6 '19 at 17:28
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @router ok, I added a line to that effect. $\endgroup$ – rschwieb Jan 6 '19 at 18:21
3
$\begingroup$

An easy way for me:

Let $ab\in J$ where $a,b \in A$

Let $a\notin J $ To show $b\in J$.

Since $a\notin J,a+J\neq 0+J$ Hence $a+J $ has an inverse in $A/J$

So $\exists (c+J) \in A/J$ such that $(a+J)(c+J)=1+J\implies ac+J=1+J\implies ac-1\in J\implies bac-b\in J\implies abc-b\in J$

Again $ab\in J\implies abc \in J$

Thus $b=b-abc+abc \in J$

|cite|improve this answer
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ How did we get from $ac-1 \in J$ to $bac-b \in J$? $\endgroup$ – Al Jebr Dec 2 '14 at 3:47
  • $\begingroup$ J is an ideal of $A$ so $b\in A$ and $ac-1\in J\implies bac-b\in J$ Got it $\endgroup$ – Learnmore Dec 2 '14 at 3:51
  • $\begingroup$ Since $J$ absorbs products in $A$, we can multiply both sides on the left by $b$? $\endgroup$ – Al Jebr Dec 2 '14 at 3:54
  • $\begingroup$ This is a sort of hybrid of the proof in the OP and the brute force proof I suggested. $\endgroup$ – rschwieb Dec 2 '14 at 4:06
  • $\begingroup$ yes you are correct @JohannFranklin $\endgroup$ – Learnmore Dec 2 '14 at 4:44

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.