1
$\begingroup$

During a lecture I've been given (only!) the definition of periodic function:

Let $A \subset \mathbb{R}, f: A \to \mathbb{R}, t > 0$; $f$ is $t$-periodic iff for every $x \in A$, we have $a+t \in A, x-t \in A$ and $f(x+t)=f(x)$.

I started reasoning of the definition and I've made some deductions and elaborated the following questions:

  • If $f$ is odd, it seems that $f^2$ is $t\over 2$ periodic. Is this true in general? Can the statement be generalized to an arbitrary $n$? Does this hold for some even functions too?

  • Can one define the constant function as a function of period $0$? Is this a good definition or is it useless? In particular, is the constant function the only function of period $0$ (this seems obvious, but how do I prove it?)?

  • Given two periodic functions $f$ and $g$, what can one say about the periodicity of $f+g, fg, \frac{f}{g}, f(g)$?

I am looking forward to receiving some formal answers and proofs to clarify these points. I would also appreciate some links to useful material on periodic functions. Thank you.

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

First: if $f$ is $t$-periodic than $f^2$ is $t$-periodic, not $t/2$-periodic. An example is the function $f: \mathbb R \to \mathbb R$ by $f(x) = \lfloor x\rfloor$. Plainly $f$ is 1-periodic, but $f^2$ is 1-periodic, but not 1/2-periodic since $f^2(0) = 0 \neq \frac{1}{4} = f^2(1/2)$.

Now in general, we have that for $f,g$ that are both $t$-periodic, then $f+g$, $fg$, and $f/g$ are all $t$-periodic as well (for $f/g$ supposing that $g$ is nonzero). Proof for the additive case: Suppose $f,g: A\to \mathbb R$ are both $t$-periodic. Then for $x \in A$, the function $f+g$ satisfies $$(f+g)(x+t) = f(x+t) + g(x+t) = f(x) + g(x) = (f+g)(x),$$ as desired. The rest of these proofs follow pretty similarly. In fact, if you have some function $\Phi: \mathbb R^2 \to \mathbb R$ and consider the function $\Phi(f,g): \mathbb R \to \mathbb R$ by $\Phi(f,g)(x) = \Phi(f(x),g(x))$, then this will be $t$-periodic as well.

In addition, asserting that a function has period zero is merely stating that $f(x) = f(x + 0)$ for all $x \in \mathbb A$, which is true for any function $f$. The characteristic of a constant function is that $f(x+t) = f(x)$ for all $t,x \in \mathbb R$, so it is sufficient to say the constant function is the function that is $t$-periodic for every $t \in \mathbb R$.


The question gets more interesting when we consider functions of different periods. A sufficient condition to guarantee periodicity of a combination function is this:

Theorem: Suppose that $f: A \to \mathbb R$ is $t$-periodic and $g: B \to \mathbb R$ is $s$-periodic, and suppose that $A + t = \{a + t \mid a \in A\} \subset A$, $B + s \subset B$. Further, suppose that $nt + ms = 0$ for integers $n,m \in \mathbb Z$ with $\gcd(n,m) = 1$, i.e. $\{t,s\}$ is $\mathbb Z$-dependent. Let $\Phi:\mathbb R^2\to \mathbb R$.

Then the function $\phi:A \cap B \to \mathbb R$ given by $\phi(x) = \Phi(f(x),g(x))$ is $nt$-periodic.

Before the proof, we need a lemma:

Lemma: If $f$ is $t$-periodic, then $f(x + nt) = f(x)$ for all $n \in \mathbb Z$.

Proof: First for $n$ positive, we proceed by induction. The base case is $n=0$. Then we know that if $f(x+nt) = f(x)$, then $f(x+(n+1)t) = f((x+nt) + t)= f(x+nt)$ by $t$-periodicity. By IHOP $f(x+nt) = f(x)$ and we are done.

For $n$ negative, we proceed by induction downwards. The base case is $n=0$. Now suppose that $f(x+nt) = f(x)$. Then $f(x+(n-1)t) = f(x + (n-1)t + t)$ by $t$-periodicity. But $f(x+ (n-1)t + t) = f(x + nt) = f(x)$ so we are done.

Now for the Proof:

Suppose we have $f,g,\Phi,\phi$ satisfying the given conditions. Then for $x \in A \cap B$ we have $\phi(x + nt) = \Phi(f(x+nt),g(x + nt)) = \Phi(f(x), g(x +nt))$ by Lemma. But $nt = -ms$, so $\phi(x+nt) = \Phi(f(x), g(x - ms)) = \Phi(f(x),g(x))$ again by Lemma.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ The OP's first question had the additional hypothesis that $f$ is odd, which $f(x)=\lfloor x\rfloor$ doesn't satisfy. A counterexample that satisfies this hypothesis is $f(x)=x^3-x$ on $[-1,1]$, extended to be $2$-periodic. $\endgroup$ – Greg Martin Dec 2 '14 at 0:15
  • $\begingroup$ Ah, you are quite right on both counts. $\endgroup$ – Joshua Mundinger Dec 2 '14 at 1:16

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.