6
$\begingroup$

This question has been modified...

Problem

Given Hilbert spaces.

In general, their algebraic tensor product isn't complete: $$\mathcal{H}\hat{\otimes}\mathcal{K}=\mathcal{H}\otimes\mathcal{K}\iff\dim\mathcal{H}<\infty\lor\dim\mathcal{K}<\infty$$ How to prove this from scratch?

Attempt

Choose orthonormal bases: $$\mathcal{S}\otimes\mathcal{T}:=\{\sigma\otimes\tau:\sigma\in\mathcal{S},\tau\in\mathcal{T}\}$$

One obtains some candidates: $$\sigma_k\otimes\tau_l\in\mathcal{S}\otimes\mathcal{T}:\quad\sum_{kl=1}^\infty\frac{1}{kl}\sigma_k\otimes\tau_l\quad\sum_{k=1}^\infty\frac{1}{kl}\delta_{kl}\sigma_k\otimes\tau_l$$ However the former one drops out: $$\sum_{kl=1}^\infty\frac{1}{kl}\sigma_k\otimes\tau_l=\left(\sum_{k=1}^\infty\frac{1}{k}\sigma_k\right)\otimes\left(\sum_{l=1}^\infty\frac{1}{l}\tau_l\right)$$ So it is not obvious at all wether the latter one works out!

Reference

Build-up on: Vector Spaces: Tensor Product

$\endgroup$
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ `Obviously, it is not complete yet.' Certainly it is complete because finite dimensional. $\endgroup$ – Tomek Kania Dec 1 '14 at 10:50
  • $\begingroup$ Come on, that was a typo, you could have known that! $\endgroup$ – C-Star-W-Star Dec 1 '14 at 11:23
  • $\begingroup$ So what is your question? Could you explain it? $\endgroup$ – Yan kai Dec 1 '14 at 16:24
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Really it is not a good idea to modify your question so as to render obsolete any answer(s) thoughtfully provided. Better is to ask a new question. $\endgroup$ – user43208 Dec 23 '14 at 16:41
5
$\begingroup$

That element you want to form is just an elementary tensor $x\otimes y$ in the algebraic tensor product $\mathcal H\otimes\mathcal H$. Then you want to have sums of those guys, and then limits of them.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Aaaah ok, so is it like this?: So if I would instead consider formally $\sum_{k,l}a_{k,l}e_k\otimes e_l$ then they're not necessarily of the form $\sum_{k,l}x_ky_le_k\otimes e_l$. $\endgroup$ – C-Star-W-Star Dec 1 '14 at 23:05
  • $\begingroup$ Yes. But a Hilbert space is in particular a complete Banach space. So you would have to argue that the formal space constructed like that is a complete Banach space with the norm induced by the inner product. It doesn't look simpler than taking the algebraic tensor product and completing it. $\endgroup$ – Martin Argerami Dec 1 '14 at 23:26
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry for the late come-back. I got my question now: Why is the algebraic tensor product of infinite dimensional Hilbert spaces incomplete yet: $\mathcal{H}\otimes\mathcal{H}\subsetneq\mathcal{H}\hat{\otimes}\mathcal{H}$ More specifically, can one construct a sequence in a general or in a special Hilbert space algebraic tensor product whos limit is certainly not contained: $z_n:=\sum_{1\leq k\leq K(n)}\sum_{1\leq l\leq L(n)}\alpha_n(i,j)s_n(i)\otimes s_n(j):\quad\|z_m-z_n\|\to0,z_n\nrightarrow z$ $\endgroup$ – C-Star-W-Star Dec 3 '14 at 10:42
  • $\begingroup$ I hope you don't mind if I unaccept your answer, do you? Still I gave you: (+1) $\endgroup$ – C-Star-W-Star Dec 19 '14 at 17:59
2
$\begingroup$

Let us choose orthonormal bases $\{e_i: i \in I\}$ of $\mathcal H$ and $\{f_j : j\in J \}$ of $\mathcal K$.

Assume $\mathcal K$ is finite dimensional, thus $J$ is finite. Let $x\in \mathcal H \hat\otimes \mathcal K$ and write it as $$ x=\sum_{j\in J} x_j \otimes f_j \quad \text{with}\quad x_j =\sum_{i\in I} (e_i\otimes e_j, x) \, e_i\,, $$ where $(\,\cdot\,,\,\cdot\,)$ is the scalar product to be chosen linear in the second argument. This shows that $x\in \mathcal H\otimes \mathcal K$.

Conversely, if both are infnite dimensional, we can identify a subset of $I$ and $J$ with $\mathbb N$. Then $$y=\sum_{n\in \mathbb N} \frac1{n!}e_n\otimes f_n \in \mathcal H\hat\otimes \mathcal K. $$ Show that $y\not \in \mathcal H\otimes \mathcal K$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Oh I forgot to answer: That is precisely I'm looking for. I tried similar constructions but couldn't figure it out. Can you explain why: $\sum_{n\in\mathbb{N}}\frac{1}{n!}e_n\otimes f_n\notin\mathcal{H}\otimes\mathcal{K}$ $\endgroup$ – C-Star-W-Star Jan 3 '15 at 16:06
  • $\begingroup$ because if $x\in \mathcal H\otimes \mathcal K$ it is finite sum of elementary tensors not infinite. (sorry for my weak english in advanced) $\endgroup$ – R.N Sep 3 '15 at 15:09
  • $\begingroup$ I linked to this question and answer here math.stackexchange.com/q/2157955 as I can't prove the last part. $\endgroup$ – Tom Collinge Feb 23 '17 at 15:08

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.