3
$\begingroup$

Let $(X, \mu)$ be a measure space, $E \subseteq X$ measurable, and $f_n$ a sequence of measurable functions on $E$. If $f$ is another function on $E$, I have seen two definitions for what it means for $f_n$ to converges to $f$ in measure:

(i) For any $\epsilon > 0$, there is an $N$ such that for all $n \geq N$, $\{ x \in E : |f_n(x) - f(x)| \geq \epsilon \}$ has measure $< \epsilon$.

(ii) For any $\epsilon > 0$, there is a measurable set $A$ with measure $< \epsilon$, and an $N$ such that for all $n \geq N$ and all $x \in E \setminus A$, $|f_n(x) - f(x)| < \epsilon$.

Both these definitions are given in Royden ( (i) is given specifically for the Lebesgue measure, (ii) for general spaces). A few questions:

1 . It does not appear anywhere in the definition that $f$ is measurable. A pointwise limit of measurable functions is measurable provided $\mu$ is complete, but even for a complete measure I see no reason why $f$ should be measurable in the definition above unless we define convergence in measure to require this. I don't even see why $\{x \in E: |f_n(x) - f(x)| \geq \epsilon \}$ should be measurable.

2 . The same question for definition (ii).

3 . Whether the definitions imply each other. Definition (i) seems to imply definition (ii).

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

It is my understanding that $f$ needs to be measurable before talking about convergence in measure (for either definition). For question 3, you are correct that (i) implies (ii) by choosing $A = \{|f_n - f|>\epsilon\}$.

For the other direction, simply note that $E\setminus A \subset \{|f_n - f|<\epsilon\}$, so $A \supset \{ |f_n - f| > \epsilon \}$, and consequently $\mu[|f_n - f| > \epsilon ] \leq \mu(A) < \epsilon$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.