4
$\begingroup$

By this post, it seems quotient groups are unique up to isomorphism. is it correct? More clearly

Let $G$ be a group and let $K,N\unlhd G$ be isomorphic normal subgroups. Are $\frac{G}{N}$ and $\frac{G}{K}$ isomorphic?

$\endgroup$
9
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Not necessarily. There is a counterexample with $G$ abelian of order $8$. $\endgroup$
    – Derek Holt
    Nov 28, 2014 at 3:33
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @Derek So the last part of that answer is not correct!? $\endgroup$ Nov 28, 2014 at 3:40
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @user795571 Notice in the answer that $\phi(g)$ is undefined if $g\in G-N$. $\endgroup$
    – J126
    Nov 28, 2014 at 3:41
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Every subgroup $n\Bbb Z\lhd \Bbb Z$ is isomorphic to $\Bbb Z$. $\endgroup$
    – Pedro
    Nov 28, 2014 at 3:45
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ For a finite example, $\mathbb{Z}^4 \oplus \mathbb{Z}^2/e \oplus \mathbb{Z}^2 \neq \mathbb{Z}^4 \oplus \mathbb{Z}^2/ \mathbb{Z}^2 \oplus e$ (Following Derek Holt's hint) $\endgroup$ Nov 28, 2014 at 4:00

2 Answers 2

12
$\begingroup$

$\mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}\neq\mathbb{Z}/3\mathbb{Z}$

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

Your statement is incorrect, but if the subgroups are isomorphic as subobjects (i.e. an isomorphism that commute with the inclusions) then it's true by general nonsense (i.e. category theory).

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .