1
$\begingroup$

Prove that if $B−C \subseteq A'$ then $A \cap B \subseteq C$.

Is it perfectly reasonable to show that $A \cap B \not\subset C$, (assuming $B−C \subseteq A'$ holds) leads to a contradiction ?

Suppose (hoping fervently to eventually reach a contradiction) that $A \cap B \not\subset C$. Then $\exists x \in A \cap B$ such that $x \not\in C$ meaning $x \in A$ and $x \in B$ and $x \not\in C$. Thus $x \in A$ and $x \in B−C$ and as $B−C \subsetneq A'$ we conclude with saying $x \in A$ and $x \not\in A$ which clearly no $x$ satisfies and so contradicts the fact $\exists x \in A \cap B$ such that $x \not\in C$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ B' is everything not in B so B complement and yh i think it does work lol $\endgroup$ – Namch96 Nov 24 '14 at 16:55
0
$\begingroup$

A direct proof is:

$B-C\subseteq A'\implies B\cap C'\subseteq A'\implies A'\cap B\cap C'=B\cap C'\implies$ $(A'\cap B\cap C')\oplus(B\cap C')=\emptyset\implies (A'\oplus U)\cap(B\cap C')=\emptyset \implies$ $A\cap B\cap C'=\emptyset\implies A\cap B\subseteq C$ $\quad\square$

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.