I'm trying to refresh my memories about stochastic processes. We know that Brownian motion has as quadratic variation equals to t. What is the quadratic variation of the Brownian motion squared ? Usually for this I would just use Ito's formula and pick out whatever is in front of the dWt, except in that case it doesn't work.

Is there a straightforward way to compute this ? thanks !

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Why doesn't it work using Itô's formula? $\endgroup$ – saz Nov 19 '14 at 7:47

There are several definitions for the quadratic variation:

  1. For a "nice" process $(X_t)_{t \geq 0}$ ("nice" means semimartingale), the quadratic variation is defined by $$[X]_t := X_t^2-X_0^2 -2 \int_0^t X_{s-} \, dX_s.$$ For $X_t := B_t^2$, we know from Itô's formula that $$d(B_s^2)= 2 B_s \, dB_2+ \, ds$$ and $$B_t^4 = 4 \int_0^t B_s^3 \, dB_s + 6 \int_0^t B_s^2 \, ds.$$ Combining these two equalities yields $$\begin{align*} [B^2]_t &= B_t^4 - 2 \int_0^t B_s^2 \, d(B_s^2) = 4 \int_0^t B_s^2 \, ds. \end{align*}$$
  2. The quadratic variation of a process $(X_t)_{t \geq 0}$ is the limit (in probability) of the sums $$S_{\Pi}(X) := \sum_{j=1}^n (X_{t_j}-X_{t_{j-1}})^2$$ as the mesh size $|\Pi|$ of the partition $\Pi=\{0=t_0< \ldots < t_n \leq t\}$ tends to $0$. For $X_t := B_t^2$, we have $$\begin{align*} S_{\Pi}(B^2) &= \sum_{j=1}^n (B_{t_j}^2-B_{t_{j-1}}^2)^2 = \sum_{j=1}^n (B_{t_j}+B_{t_{j+1}})^2 \cdot (B_{t_j}-B_{t_{j-1}})^2 \\ &= \sum_{j=1}^n (B_{t_j}+B_{t_{j+1}})^2 \bigg[(B_{t_j}-B_{t_{j-1}})^2-(t_j-t_{j-1}) \bigg] + \sum_{j=1}^n (B_{t_j}+B_{t_{j+1}})^2 (t_j-t_{j-1}) \\ &= I_1+I_2. \end{align*}$$ Recall that $$\sum_{j=1}^n g(t_j) \cdot (t_j-t_{j-1}) \to \int_0^t g(s) \, ds \qquad \text{as} \, n \to \infty$$ for any continuous function $g$. Using the continuity of $g$, it is therefore not difficult to see that $$\sum_{j=1}^n (g(t_j)+g(t_{j+1}))^2 (t_j-t_{j-1}) \to 4\int_0^t g(s)^2 \, ds.$$ Applying this to the continuous sample paths of the Brownian motion, we find that $$I_2 \to 4 \int_0^t B_s^2 \, ds.$$ It remains to prove that $I_1$ converges to $0$. This follows from some straightforward calculations (Hint: Show that the $L^2$-norm converges to $0$ using that $B_t^2-t$ is a martingale).

As mentionned by saz from Itô's lemma applied to $Y_t=B^2_t$ you get :

$dY_t=finite_variation_ter.dt + 2.B_tdB_t$

so the quadratic variation is (using Itô's isometry) is equal to :

$$<Y>_t=4\int_0^t B_s^2ds$$

Please note that this is a stochastic process.

Best regards


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.