# How to show that every Boolean ring is commutative?

A ring $R$ is a Boolean ring provided that $a^2=a$ for every $a \in R$. How can we show that every Boolean ring is commutative?

• There's a proof of this in the first chapter of Halmos' Lectures on Boolean Algebras. – Michael Hardy Sep 8 '11 at 12:44
• This is exercise 15 from chapter 7 Introduction to Rings section 1 Definitions and Examples in Dummit and Foote, 3rd edition. – nilo de roock Sep 19 '14 at 10:25

Every Boolean ring is of characteristic 2, since $a+a=(a+a)^2=a^2+a^2+a^2+a^2=a+a+a+a\implies a+a=0$.
Now, for any $x,y$ in the ring $x+y=(x+y)^2=x^2+xy+yx+y^2=x+y+xy+yx$, so $xy+yx=0$ and hence $xy+(xy+yx)=xy$. But since the ring has characteristic 2, $yx=xy$.

• How do you go from xx+xy+yx+yy to x+xy+yx+y? – NUG Feb 22 '17 at 18:58
• @NUG Since every element in $R$ is idempotent. – Bach Jun 10 at 10:46

I always like to know where these problems come from, their history. This was first proved in a paper by Stone in 1936. Here's a link to that paper for anyone who is interested:

His proof is in the first full paragraph on p. 40.

• Can someone provide a valid link or just copy the main idea? I failed to load the paper but I am eager to take a look at it. Thanks. – Bach Jun 10 at 10:41

Of course, this is an old chestnut: if you are interested in typical generalizations of this commutativity theorem in a wider, more structural context (to associative, unitary rings) I suggest reading T.Y. Lam's beautiful Springer GTM 131 "A First Course in Noncommutative Rings", Chapter 4, §12, in particular the Jacobson-Herstein Theorem (12.9), p. 209: A (unitary, associative) ring $R$ is commutative iff for any $a,b\in R$ one always has $(ab-ba)^{n+1}=ab-ba$ for some $n\in\mathbb N$ ($n$ generally depending on $a,b$). (Further, using Artin's theorem concerning diassociativity of alternative algebrae, associativity of $R$ may be weakened to alternativity.) Cp. also the exercises given, in particular Ex. 9. Note that the Boolean case is special, as that the ring considered needn't be unitary a-priori. Kind regards - Stephan F. Kroneck.

We want to show that $xy = yx$ for all $x,y \in R$. We know that $(x+y)^2 = x+y$. So $(x+y)^2 = (x+y)(x+y) = xx+xy+yx+yy = x+xy+yx+y = x+x^2y^2+y^2x^2+y$. This equals $x+(xy)+(yx) + y = x+y$ so that $xy = yx$.

• How do you go from xx+xy+yx+yy to x+xy+yx+y? – NUG Feb 22 '17 at 18:56
• $xx+xy+yx+yy = x^2 +xy+yx+y^2 = x+xy+yx+y$ because it was given that $a^2 =a$ for all $a \in R$. – Matt Robbins Feb 28 '18 at 18:56
• Hello, how does $xy+yx$ imply $xy=yx$? Doesn't $xy=yx$ imply $xy-yx=0$, and so how is $xy+yx=0$? – numericalorange Apr 3 '18 at 22:49
• @numericalorange because the Boolean ring is of characteristic 2, and so 1+1=0 implies that 1 = -1 :) – IntegrateThis Apr 20 at 3:42

Plug $a = x + y$.

HINT $\rm\quad\ \ A = X+Y\ \ \Rightarrow\ \ X\ Y = - Y\ X\:.\$ But $\rm -1 = 1\$ via $\rm\ A = -1$

If $a,b\in R$, \begin{align} 2ba &=4ba-2ba\\ &=4(ba)^2-2ba\\ &=(2ba)^2-2ba\\ &=2ba-2ba\\ &=0, \end{align} so \begin{align} ab &=ab+0\\ &=ab+2ba\\ &=[ab+ba]+ba\\ &=[(a+b)^2-a^2-b^2]+ba\\ &=[(a+b)-a-b]+ba\\ &=0+ba\\ &=ba. \end{align}

As Yuval points out $(x+y)^{2} = x+y$ which implies $x^{2} + y^{2} + x \cdot y + y \cdot x = x+y$. Now from this you have $x \cdot y + y \cdot x =0$.

• I don't work out the rest because, Timothy has already done it before me. – anonymous Nov 14 '10 at 18:46

When you get to the part where ab=-ba ab =-ba (1) Pre-multiply a to both sides a(ab)=a(-ba)
a^2b=a-ba ab=a-ba (2) Post-multiply a to (1) (ab)a=(-ba)a aba=-ba^2 aba=-ba (3) . . . From (2) & (3), you can deduce that ab=ba

I have solved this question myself and wonder what are the solutions on the Internet, and yet since I didn't see any solution like mine (most probably because my solution didn't notice that the ring is of characteristic $$2$$). Anyway, I will put it here.

For any $$x,y$$ in the ring let $$a=xy-yx$$, then $$xax=x^2yx-xyx^2=xyx-xyx=0$$ and $$xay=x^2y^2-xyxy=xy-(xy)^2=0$$ hence $$0=(xax)y-(xay)x=xa(xy-yx)=xa^2=xa.$$ Seeking for symmetry we find that $$y(-a)=0$$, and so $$ya=ya+y(-a)=y(a+(-a))=y0=0$$ hence $$0=x(ya)-y(xa)=(xy-yx)a=a^2=a.$$ This completes the proof.

## protected by user26857Dec 5 '15 at 10:38

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).