7
$\begingroup$

Question is Find the extrema of $xyz$ when $x+y+z=a$ , a>0. Strating with usual Lagrange Multiplier method

i get

$f_x$ = $yz$ +$\lambda$ =0

$f_y$ = $xz$ +$\lambda$ =0

$f_z$ = $yz$ +$\lambda$ =0

Now from three equations above of i multiply first by $x$ and second by $y$ and third by $z$ i get

$f_x$ = $xyz$ +$\lambda(x)$ =0

$f_y$ = $xyz$ +$\lambda(y)$ =0

$f_z$ = $xyz$ +$\lambda$(z) =0

Clearly from these equating values of $xyz$ . i get $x=y=z$ .And thus i have solved the question and is consistent with my answer with textbook

BUT,If i manipulate equations in a way as if i equate values of $\lambda$ i get

$yz=xz=xy$

Now i take $yz=xz$ .This implies either $z=0 or x=y$ .

IF i take $z=0$ and put in other two equations i get $xy=0$ which means either x=0 or y=o.Say i take x=0 and now putting in constraint equation i get $y=a$ so i get $(0,a,0)$ ..Not only this but by solving other equations like this i get $(0,a,0) , (a,0,0) , (0,0,a) , ((a-1)/2,(a-1)/2,1)$ but this isnot consistent with textbook .Can anybody help me out from here .Thanks

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Your working and answers look good to me. I suggest you carefully check the question in the book. It may have stated that $x,y,z,a$ are all positive (or something similar). Then the solutions $x=0$ etc would not be valid. In this case $xyz$ would have no minimum, because it can be as close as you like to zero but can never equal zero. $\endgroup$ – David Nov 15 '14 at 5:40
  • $\begingroup$ @David they have said $a > 0$ $\endgroup$ – Sophie Clad Nov 15 '14 at 5:43
  • $\begingroup$ If $x,y,z$ are allowed to be negative then $xyz$ can be as large as you like in the negative direction and so there is no minimum. You should check the possibilities $x=0$ etc (as you have done) but in this case they do not give maximum or minimum values. Remember that solving the Lagrange equations gives possible extreme points, but some of them may in fact turn out to be not extreme points. $\endgroup$ – David Nov 15 '14 at 5:48
  • $\begingroup$ @David .then wat about $((a−1)/2, (a−1)/2, 1)$ . The correct answer is at $(a/3,a/3/a/3)$ which i have found by my former manipulation of equations . but that is fine .Out of 4 points i have obtained the first three gives $f=0$ .so they can also be ruled out because of $(a/3,a/3/a/3)$ (it gives $a^{3}/27$) . $\endgroup$ – Sophie Clad Nov 15 '14 at 5:53
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Doesn't matter, you are looking for maximum and minimum values, and if $f$ can be negative then $0$ isn't a minimum. $\endgroup$ – David Nov 15 '14 at 6:08
3
$\begingroup$

There must be some constraints on $x,y,z$

Without using Lagrange Multiplier

Assuming $x,y,z\gt0$

Using AM-GM

$$\frac{x+y+z}{3}\ge\sqrt[3]{xyz}$$

$$x+y+z=a\ge3\sqrt[3]{xyz}$$ $$\frac{a^3}{27}\ge xyz$$ and equality occurs when $x=y=z$

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ this is another approach .thanks $\endgroup$ – Sophie Clad Nov 15 '14 at 6:31
2
$\begingroup$

You have derived the correct result with the Lagrange Multiplier method:

$xy = yz = zx = -\lambda$

Here $\lambda$ is a non-zero parameter. From this it follows that $x, y$ and $z$ can not be zero. The only solution is $x = y = z = \sqrt{-\lambda}$. And therefore $x = y = z = a/3$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ i see . thankss $\endgroup$ – Sophie Clad Nov 15 '14 at 7:19

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.