This was asked here: Zero divisor in $R[x]$

But what I'm really asking is:

If $f(x)=a_0+a_1x+\cdots+a_nx^n$ is a zero divisor in $R[x]$, isn't every $a_i$ a zero divisor in $R$?

Let $q(x)f(x)=0$. Then clearly $a_0q_0=0$. So $a_0$ is a zero divisor. Assume this is the case for all $a_i$ with $i\leq n-1$. Write $p_i$ for the non zero elements such that $p_ia_i=0$ and define $A=p_0p_1...p_{n-1}$. Since $a_0q_{n}+a_1q_{n-1}+...+a_{n-1}q_1+a_nq_0=0$ (the coefficient of the term $x^n$) multiplying both sides by $A$ gives $Aq_0a_n=0$. Since $Aq_0$ is non zero, $a_n$ is a zero divisor.

Is this correct?

  • $\begingroup$ Why $Aq_0\neq 0$? $\endgroup$ – ajotatxe Nov 9 '14 at 13:09
  • $\begingroup$ because all $p_i$ are non zero and $q_0$ is non zero too. $\endgroup$ – bella Nov 9 '14 at 13:18

There's a flaw in your proof.

For example, if you take $R=\mathbb{Z}/4\mathbb{Z}$ and $f(x)=2x^2 +2x + 2$, in the third step of the proof you have $A= 2\cdot 2 = 0$, so you're multiplying by $0$.

For the solution you can read this.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.