2
$\begingroup$

I am learning Sylow's theorems in my algebra course and I was reading questions posted before. One is the following: If $H$ is a normal subgroup of a finite group $G$ and $|H|=p^k$ for some prime $p$. show that $H$ is contained in every sylow $p$ subgroup of $G$

I follow the selected answer and I have the following proof:

$H$ is subgroup of a power of $p$, so it is contained in a maximal $p$-subgroup. Indeed, the maximal $p$-subgroup, call it $A$, is a $p$-Sylow subgroup. If $B$ is another $p$-Sylow subgroup, then by Sylow's 2nd theorem, they are conjugate of each other. Since $H$ is normal, the conjugate of $H \subset A$ is $H$, which is contained in $B$. Thus, $H$ is contained in every $p$-Sylow subgroup of $G$.

It seems fine but I don't see why the bolded words stand. It may be trivial to you but I would be thankful if you can show it in some details. Thanks in advance.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ have a look at this $\endgroup$
    – happymath
    Nov 7 '14 at 16:27
  • $\begingroup$ Yes I have included this link in my post but I still don't understand this fine detail after reading it. $\endgroup$
    – Nighty
    Nov 7 '14 at 16:29
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ have a look at the second proof it says $HK$ is a subgroup where $H$ is the given subgroup and $K$ is taken to be the Sylow P Subgroup now order of $HK$ is more than $P^m$ if $H \cap K \neq H$ where m is the max power of p dividing $|G|$ $\endgroup$
    – happymath
    Nov 7 '14 at 16:31
2
$\begingroup$

A subset of a set is said to be "maximal" with respect to a given property if it is not contained in a different, generally larger, subset having the property. There a maximal $p$ subgroup is a $p$ subgroup that is not contained in another $p$ subgroup.

We could use Zorn's lemma for this, but note that the group is finite. If the $p$-group is not contained in another $p$-group, then it is maximal. Otherwise it is contained in a larger $p$-group, and you can use descending induction to show that since the larger $p$-group is contained in a maximal $p$-group, so is the smaller one. By definition a maximal $p$ subgroup is a Sylow subgroup, so every $p$-subgroup is contained in a Sylow subgroup.

$\endgroup$
0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.